天眼评分
MUFG
https://www.tr.mufg.jp/index.html
官方网址
评分指数
影响力
影响力
AAA
影响力指数 NO.1
联系方式
WikiFX Data 提供单核
1G
40G
1M*ADSL
- 该交易商WikiFX实勘差评已达到2条,请注意风险,谨防受害!
浏览 MUFG 的用户还浏览了..
EC Markets
HANTEC MARKETS
搜索来源
投放语言
市场分析
素材投放
官网鉴定
mufg.jp
118.215.176.115服务器所在地新加坡
备案号--主要访问国家/地区日本
域名创建时间2004-11-18网站名称WHOIS.JPRS.JP所属公司JAPAN REGISTRY SERVICES
关系族谱
相关企业
公司简介
| MUFG 评论摘要 | |
| 成立时间 | 2001 |
| 注册国家/地区 | 日本 |
| 监管 | FCA, LFSA |
| 服务 | 投资者服务、资产管理、房地产和股票转让机构 |
| 客户支持 | 联系表单 |
| Line, Facebook, Youtube | |
| 地址:日本东京千代田区丸之内1-4-5 | |
成立于2001年,三菱UFJ金融集团(MUFG)是世界上最大、最多元化的金融集团之一。该集团的股票在东京、名古屋和纽约证券交易所上市。MUFG的服务包括商业银行、信托银行、证券、信用卡、消费金融、资产管理、租赁等多个金融服务领域。该集团拥有日本银行中最大的海外网络,包括在50多个国家设有办事处和子公司,包括联合银行。

优点和缺点
| 优点 | 缺点 |
| 历史悠久 | 没有直接联系渠道 |
| 受FCA和LFSA监管 | |
| 提供多种服务 |
MUFG是否合法?
是的。MUFG是一家信誉良好的公司。它在金融行为监管局(FCA)和拉布安金融服务局(LFSA)的监管下运营。
| 监管状态 | 受监管 |
| 监管机构 | 金融行为监管局(FCA) |
| 许可机构 | Mitsubishi UFJ Trust and Banking Corporation |
| 许可类型 | 市场做市(MM) |
| 许可证号码 | 124708 |

| 监管状态 | 受监管 |
| 监管机构 | 拉布安金融服务局(LFSA) |
| 许可机构 | MUFG银行有限公司拉布安分行 |
| 许可类型 | 市场做市(MM) |
| 许可证号码 | 未发布 |

服务
| 服务 | 支持 |
| 投资者服务 | ✔ |
| 资产管理 | ✔ |
| 房地产 | ✔ |
| 股票转让机构 | ✔ |

企业画像
- 20年以上
- 英国监管
- 香港监管
- 马来西亚监管
- 全牌照(MM)
- 期货合约交易
- 自研
- 全球展业
- 高级风险隐患
Wiki问答
Could you outline the primary advantages and disadvantages of trading with MUFG?
From my perspective as a long-term forex trader, MUFG’s strengths stem mainly from its established reputation and strict regulatory oversight. With over twenty years in the financial sector and well-known regulatory licenses from both the UK’s Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) and the Labuan Financial Services Authority (LFSA) in Malaysia, I see clear indications that MUFG is a legitimate and highly regulated entity. The backing of Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, which operates globally and is listed on major stock exchanges, further supports its credibility. In terms of services, MUFG offers a breadth typical of a major institution, including investor services, asset management, and real estate solutions. However, caution is warranted. The WikiFX risk management index for MUFG is currently at zero, which is a notable concern for me. Personal security and operational transparency are paramount when dealing with significant funds, and I noticed field reports indicating that an official office presence could not be confirmed in London. Additionally, the available user reviews point to unresolved withdrawal issues, which for me is a serious red flag and underscores the importance of only trading what I can afford to lose. Communication appears limited, with no direct telephone support channels advertised, which can complicate timely problem resolution. In summary, while MUFG’s decades-long presence and strong regulatory status provide reassurance, practical operational concerns and reported user issues mean I proceed very cautiously if considering them as a broker.
Is automated trading with Expert Advisors (EAs) available on MUFG's trading platforms?
As someone with years of forex trading experience, I always scrutinize broker platform compatibility with automated strategies before choosing where to trade. With MUFG, I noted that they provide access to both MT4 and MT5 servers—platforms renowned for their robust support of automated trading through Expert Advisors (EAs). For me, this means that, in principle, MUFG’s infrastructure should technically allow the deployment of EAs, as both MetaTrader 4 and MetaTrader 5 are widely trusted in the industry for automated trading capabilities, advanced charting, and algorithmic scripting. However, I exercise caution and advise others to do the same before proceeding. While WikiFX’s data confirms that MUFG offers self-developed platforms and mentions sound system services for their full-license MetaTrader environments, there is no explicit broker statement about EA-specific restrictions or permissions. In my experience, regulations, risk controls, or broker-specific policies can sometimes impact how freely EAs may function or whether certain strategies (like high-frequency trading) are fully permitted. Additionally, the risk management index for MUFG is notably low, which raises questions about how protective their systems are regarding automated malfunction or misuse. Given these observations, my conservative recommendation is to directly consult MUFG’s client agreement and support channels—though I did notice direct contact options are limited—before deploying EAs. Verifying any nuanced restrictions or requirements can help avoid unexpected issues and give more confidence in running automated strategies. In summary, the technical foundation for EA trading appears to be present with MUFG, but diligent confirmation and ongoing oversight are both prudent and necessary steps from my professional perspective.
Which types of payment options does MUFG offer for making deposits and withdrawals, such as credit cards, PayPal, Skrill, or cryptocurrencies?
In my experience researching and evaluating brokers, I pay close attention to the details about deposit and withdrawal methods, as these are critical to both convenience and security. With MUFG, despite its long history and well-regulated status under both the FCA and LFSA, I found that their WikiFX profile does not specify particular payment methods such as credit cards, PayPal, Skrill, or cryptocurrencies for funding or withdrawing from trading accounts. For me, this lack of clear information is noteworthy because transparent disclosure of funding options is standard among top-tier brokers and crucial for planning my trading operations. Given MUFG’s global banking background and comprehensive range of financial services, I would normally expect a variety of mainstream banking options, possibly emphasizing bank wire transfers given the brand’s institutional scale. However, without concrete disclosure, I cannot confirm if they support e-wallets or digital currencies. I also noticed some concerning user feedback related to withdrawal issues, which increases my caution. Therefore, before considering MUFG for my trading, I would strongly recommend directly contacting their customer support for up-to-date and specific information on available deposit and withdrawal channels. I believe it is vital not to assume the availability of favored payment options without confirmation, particularly given the importance of smooth and secure access to one’s funds in forex trading.
What is the highest leverage MUFG provides for major forex pairs, and how does their leverage policy differ for other types of assets?
Based on my research and trading experience with major industry brokers, getting clear, public details about MUFG’s maximum leverage—especially for major forex pairs—can be challenging. From what I could gather, official disclosures about MUFG’s specific leverage offerings are not published directly on their public sources or via WikiFX’s analysis. This raises a flag for me; as a trader, transparency about leverage is crucial when managing risk, particularly with a global institution like MUFG. Given that MUFG is regulated by both the UK’s Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) and Labuan Financial Services Authority (LFSA) in Malaysia, I expect their leverage parameters to comply with region-specific regulations. Under the FCA, leverage on major forex pairs is typically capped at 30:1, as a matter of consumer protection. However, brokers operating under Labuan might offer higher leverage, but that information isn’t explicitly confirmed for MUFG in the context provided. When it comes to other asset types, such as minor and exotic forex pairs or CFDs, established regulatory norms usually require even stricter leverage limits due to greater volatility and risk. However, again, MUFG doesn’t specify these details in the information available. For me, this lack of clarity would require directly contacting their support team before considering any significant trading activity, as responsible risk management hinges on knowing leverage and margin requirements. I always prefer to proceed cautiously until these fundamentals are fully documented.
用户评价 2
你要评价的内容
请输入...






