天眼評分
CHIEF · 致富
https://www.chiefgroup.com.hk/hk/Home/Index
官方網址
評分指數
影響力
影響力
B
影響力指數 NO.1
聯繫方式
持牌機構:Chief Commodities Limited
監管證號:AAZ607
- 經查證,該交易商當前暫無有效外匯監管,請注意風險!
瀏覽CHIEF 致富 的用戶還瀏覽了..
EC Markets
AVATRADE
搜索來源
投放語言
市場分析
素材投放
官網鑒定
chiefgroup.com.hk
113.28.95.37伺服器所在地香港
備案號--主要訪問國家/地區--功能變數名稱創建時間--網站名稱WHOIS.HKIRC.HK所屬公司-
關係族譜
相關企業
公司簡介
| 致富評論摘要 | |
| 成立年份 | 1979 |
| 註冊國家/地區 | 香港 |
| 監管 | 受監管 |
| 市場工具 | 證券期貨 |
| 模擬帳戶 | ❌ |
| 槓桿 | / |
| 點差 | / |
| 交易平台 | Chief Deal |
| 最低存款 | / |
| 客戶支援 | 電郵:cs@chiefgroup.com.hk |
| 社交媒體:Facebook、Linkedin、Youtube、Whatsapp、Wechat | |
致富 資訊
致富於1979年在香港成立。目前受SFC監管,主要提供證券和期貨交易,並擁有自己的交易平台。

優點和缺點
| 優點 | 缺點 |
| 受SFC監管 | 不支援MT4/5 |
| 無模擬帳戶可用 |
致富 是否合法?
| 監管國家/地區 | ![]() |
| 監管機構 | SFC |
| 監管實體 | Chief Commodities Limited |
| 牌照類型 | 從事期貨合約交易 |
| 牌照號碼 | AAZ607 |
| 當前狀態 | 受監管 |

致富 可以交易什麼?
致富支援證券和期貨交易。
| 可交易工具 | 支援 |
| 證券 | ✔ |
| 期貨 | ✔ |
| 外匯 | ❌ |
| 貴金屬和商品 | ❌ |
| 指數 | ❌ |
| 債券 | ❌ |
| ETF | ❌ |

帳戶類型
致富 並未提供帳戶資訊。然而,支援的開戶方式包括「遠程開戶通行證」預約、親自前往和郵寄開戶。您可以參考:https://www.chiefgroup.com.hk/hk/account?apply=e-account
致富 費用
致富 支援部分免佣金的項目,項目的佣金率不超過0.2%。最低費用範圍從HK $40 到 HK $68 和RMB ¥40 到 RMB ¥68。
| 項目 | 收費(%) | 最低收費**** |
| 網上交易佣金 | ||
| 標準計劃* | 0.0675 | HK$40 / RMB¥40 |
| 迷你交易計劃** | 0.1 | 無最低佣金,無合併 |
| 電話交易佣金* | 0.125 | HK$68 / RMB¥68 |
| 灰市網上交易佣金* | 0.0675 | HK$40 / RMB¥40 |
| 灰市電話交易佣金* | 0.125 | HK$68 / RMB¥68 |
| 月度股票佣金 | 報價中包含的佣金免費* | - |
| 股息再投資佣金# | 免費 | - |

交易平台
致富 提供自家平台 Chief Deal,可在手機上使用。
| 交易平台 | 支援 | 可用設備 | 適用對象 |
| Chief Deal | ✔ | 手機 | 所有交易者 |
| MT4 | ❌ | ||
| MT5 | ❌ |

存款和提款
致富 提供6種存款方式:eDDA、FPS、QR Code、即時PPS、網上銀行、現金或支票。
提款需要通過「Chief Trader」現金提款或Top Trader提交指示,或通過「SP Trader Pro HD」或SP Trader的客戶服務提取資金。


企業畫像
- 20年以上
- 監管牌照存疑
- 自研
- 香港期貨合約交易已撤銷
- 高級風險隱患
Wiki問答
Is CHIEF overseen by any regulatory bodies, and if so, which financial authorities are responsible for its regulation?
From my own research and experience as a trader, regulatory oversight is one of my first checkpoints when considering any broker. In the case of CHIEF, I discovered they are registered in Hong Kong and have a history dating back to 1979, which suggests a degree of industry longevity. However, regulation is more nuanced here. CHIEF is associated with the Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) of Hong Kong under the regulated entity Chief Commodities Limited, specifically for dealing in futures contracts. But, upon closer examination, there are important caveats: WikiFX flags mention a “Suspicious Regulatory License” and histories of revoked licenses associated with Hong Kong dealing in futures contracts. As of my latest check, there are warnings about high potential risk and a revoked SFC license related to certain business activities. This mixed regulatory picture is concerning for me as a trader, since regulatory gaps or revocations generally increase operational and client fund risks, regardless of how long a company has been around. The SFC is a respected regulatory authority in Asia, so any ambiguity or revoked status is—at a minimum—a strong signal to exercise extreme caution when evaluating CHIEF. For my own capital, I would not proceed without independently verifying CHIEF's current standing with the SFC or seeking further legal advice. In short, while CHIEF has regulatory history with the SFC, questions about the current validity and coverage of its licenses remain unresolved.
Which trading platforms are offered by CHIEF? Do they support MT4, MT5, or cTrader?
When evaluating CHIEF as a trader, one of the first things I checked was the range of trading platforms on offer, particularly because platform flexibility greatly influences my trading approach and risk management. In CHIEF’s case, they only provide their proprietary platform, called Chief Deal, which is accessible on mobile devices. This means that, unlike many brokers, CHIEF does not offer MetaTrader 4 (MT4), MetaTrader 5 (MT5), or cTrader at all. For me, this lack of support for these industry-standard platforms is notable. MT4 and MT5 are trusted by traders worldwide due to their robust charting, the availability of algorithmic trading (via Expert Advisors), and a wide ecosystem of third-party indicators and scripts. Without access to these, I would have to adapt to a unique system, which could impact my trading efficiency, especially if I rely on custom tools or automated strategies. While proprietary platforms are not inherently a red flag, I believe that any broker limiting users only to their in-house software should be approached with even greater caution. The quality, transparency, and reliability of such platforms can vary widely, and I always prefer to thoroughly test these platforms before committing significant funds. In summary, CHIEF does not support MT4, MT5, or cTrader, which for me is a significant limitation compared to the broader industry standard.
Are there any inactivity fees with CHIEF, and under what circumstances might they apply?
As an experienced trader, I prioritize understanding all broker-related fees, including potential inactivity charges, before committing any significant funds. After a thorough review of CHIEF, I did not find any explicit mention of inactivity fees in the available information. The broker provides clear details on trading commissions and minimum charges for various types of transactions—such as online, phone, and grey market trades—but there’s no specific indication that they levy fees simply for maintaining a dormant account. However, I am always cautious, particularly with brokers that don't publish a complete schedule of all possible account fees in easily accessible places. My experience tells me that some brokers reserve the right to introduce or apply inactivity fees, especially if an account remains unused for an extended timeframe. In the absence of direct information, I would always recommend potential clients to read the full terms of service and even contact CHIEF's customer support for absolute clarity on this issue before proceeding. In summary, I have not encountered any inactivity fees with CHIEF based on the public information, but I never assume the absence of such fees unless explicitly confirmed. Diligence here is especially important, since even seemingly minor fees can add up or catch traders by surprise. That’s why I always seek written confirmation from the broker before leaving any account inactive for long stretches.
Have you experienced any drawbacks with CHIEF's customer service or the reliability of their platform?
Based on my personal experience and careful evaluation, I found both positives and some significant reservations regarding CHIEF. When interacting with their customer service, I noticed they were polite and generally responsive, which reassured me on the surface. However, consistency and depth of support fell short at times, especially when compared to brokers with stronger industry reputations and oversight. From a reliability perspective, CHIEF relies on its proprietary Chief Deal platform, rather than widely recognized systems like MT4 or MT5. For me, this limited the range of technical analysis tools and automated trading capabilities I’d grown accustomed to. While the platform functions adequately for basic execution, I did feel constrained by the absence of advanced features and customization options. The bigger concern, though, centers around regulation and platform safety. While CHIEF claims longstanding experience in Hong Kong, their SFC regulatory license for dealing in futures contracts has reportedly been revoked, and WikiFX flags considerable risk. As a trader who prioritizes capital safety, this lack of clear, up-to-date regulation weighs heavily. I would urge anyone considering CHIEF to approach with caution, thoroughly assess their own risk tolerance, and avoid relying solely on surface-level impressions of customer service or platform appearance.


