WikiFX

Reply

In my experience as a trader, credibility is absolutely vital when selecting a broker, and my review of ZHONGYANG highlights some substantial concerns. Although ZHONGYANG has been operational for 5–10 years and claims regulation under Hong Kong’s SFC, I noticed their licenses are marked as “exceeded” and “suspicious clone.” This strongly suggests the possibility that the broker may not currently possess genuine, effective regulatory oversight. For me, this immediately signals a medium to high risk, as authentic licensing is the primary factor I rely upon for fund security and dispute resolution. Another major issue is the suspicious scope and overrun of business cited against ZHONGYANG and its associated entities. As someone who prioritizes strict compliance and transparency, any suggestion of regulatory irregularities is something I approach with utmost caution. Additionally, I observed feedback from at least one user mentioning account access being changed without permission, leading to significant losses—a scenario that further undermines trust. While ZHONGYANG does offer access to global securities and futures markets and responsive customer service, the risks stemming from questionable licensing and user reports of problematic conduct outweigh these positives. Personally, until I see clarity regarding their legal status and a clean regulatory record, I would avoid entrusting substantial funds or sensitive information to ZHONGYANG. In the world of trading, a conservative, evidence-based approach to broker selection is, in my view, always warranted.