WikiFX

Reply

Based on my careful review of Fulbright Financial Group, I approached its legitimacy with a healthy degree of skepticism, as I do with any broker handling client funds. Fulbright has operated in Hong Kong for 15–20 years, and I noted that only its futures trading entity, Fulbright Futures Limited, currently maintains an active license regulated by the Hong Kong SFC. This regulatory oversight is a significant positive, as the SFC is known for stringent standards, but I was concerned to see that the securities and asset management branches’ licenses have expired. To me, this signals that clients should remain vigilant about which part of the group they’re engaging with, as only the futures arm retains current regulatory protection. I also observed that while Fulbright offers access to multiple global markets and provides its own trading platforms, there’s a lack of transparency around minimum deposits and no availability of demo accounts. These gaps could present barriers or uncertainties, especially for newer traders seeking to test services before committing real capital. The fees are reportedly slightly below market average, which is attractive, but my experience tells me that pricing alone should never outweigh due diligence on regulation and operational history. The handful of user reviews mostly appear cautiously positive, but I place more weight on the underlying regulatory situation and operational transparency. For me, Fulbright Financial Group demonstrates elements of legitimacy—particularly in its futures business—yet I remain conservative, recommending any trader to directly verify which legal entity will hold your account and ensure their current license status before depositing funds.