简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
SEC Sues Unicoin, Executives for $100M Crypto Fraud Scheme
Abstract:SEC charges Unicoin and executives with $100M fraud, alleging fake real estate backing and inflated token sale claims. Lawsuit seeks penalties.

On Tuesday, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) launched a lawsuit against Unicoin, a cryptocurrency company, and three of its leaders, accusing them of a scam that tricked investors out of over $100 million. The SEC pointed fingers at Unicoins CEO Alexander Konanykhin, former board chair Maria Moschini, senior vice president and lawyer Richard Devlin, and former investment officer Alejandro Dominguez, saying they broke securities laws.
The SECs court filing claims Unicoin lied about owning real estate to back its crypto tokens. From September 2023 to January 2024, the company bragged about buying properties in Argentina, Thailand, Antigua, and the Bahamas, saying they were worth over $1.4 billion. The SEC says most of these deals never happened, and the properties were worth only about $300 million. This made investors think their money was safer than it was.

The SEC also says Unicoin fudged its fundraising numbers. The company told people it raised $3 billion by selling “rights certificates” by June 2024, but it only collected $110 million. The executives allegedly hyped up these false numbers on social media and elsewhere to make Unicoin seem more successful and draw in more investors.
Unicoin‘s marketing was flashy and bold. The SEC noted ads on taxis, ferries, elevator screens in office buildings, digital billboards, drink coasters, TV shows, news sites, and even public Wi-Fi spots. These ads promised huge profits, with some claiming investors could make up to 9 million percent, comparing Unicoin to Bitcoin’s massive growth. Social media posts urged people to “jump in early with Unicoin,” hinting it could turn small investors into millionaires, just like Bitcoin did for some.
Trouble started brewing last December when Unicoin got a Wells notice from the SEC, then led by Chair Gary Gensler, warning of coming fraud charges. In April, Konanykhin wrote to Unicoin‘s shareholders, saying the company turned down an SEC offer to settle. He called it an “ultimatum” with demands he wouldn’t accept. In a CoinDesk interview, he claimed the SEC‘s investigation hurt Unicoin to the tune of billions, but didn’t share specifics.
Unicoin and its leaders havent commented on the latest lawsuit. Earlier this year, after a Wall Street Journal story, a spokesperson said Unicoin was the only crypto company fully registered, regulated, audited, and reporting publicly in the U.S., insisting it followed all rules. The SEC disagrees and wants the company to pay back profits and face fines for the alleged wrongdoing.
This case is part of a bigger push by regulators to crack down on crypto companies making shady promises or selling unregistered securities. It highlights the dangers investors face in the wild world of crypto, where big-return claims can hide serious lies. As the lawsuit moves forward, the SEC is determined to hold Unicoin and its bosses responsible for what it calls a planned effort to fool investors.

Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.
Read more

Consob Targets Political Deepfake “Clone Sites” and Unlicensed Platforms in Latest Enforcement Round
New Consob blackouts expose cloned investment sites and illegal forex platforms; investors are urged to verify licences and domains before funding any account.

Fidelity Exposed: Traders Complain About Withdrawal Denials, Frozen Accounts & Platform Glitches
Does Fidelity Investments prevent you from accessing funds despite numerous assurances on your requests? Do you witness an account freeze by the US-based forex broker every time you request withdrawal access? Do you struggle with an unstable trading platform here? Is the slow Fidelity customer service making you face forced liquidation? These issues haunt traders, with many of them voicing their frustration on several broker review platforms such as WikiFX. In this Fidelity review article, we have shared quite a few complaints for you to look at. Read on!

Exposing The Trading Pit: Traders Blame the Broker for Unfair Withdrawal Denials & Account Blocks
Did you receive contradictory emails from The Trading Pit, with one approving payout and another rejecting it, citing trading rule violations? Did you purchase multiple trading accounts but receive a payout on only one of them? Did The Trading Pit prop firm refund you for the remaining accounts without clear reasoning? Did you face account bans despite using limited margins and keeping investment risks to a minimum? These are some raging complaints found under The Trading Pit review. We will share some of these complaints in this article. Take a look.

M&G Review: Traders Report Fund Scams, Misleading Market Info & False Return Promises
Applying for multiple withdrawals at M&G Investments but not getting it into your bank account? Do you see the uncredited withdrawal funds out of your forex trading account on the M&G login? Does the customer support service fail to address this trading issue? Does the misleading market information provided on this forex broker’s trading platform make you lose all your invested capital? Were you lured into investing under the promise of guaranteed forex returns? These issues have become highly common for traders at M&G Investments. In this M&G review article, we have echoed investor sentiments through their complaint screenshots. Take a look!
