简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
Barclays Capital reached an agreement to pay a $700,000 fine as part of a settlement with the FINRA.
Abstract:The settlement stems from alleged violations of FINRA rules regarding conflicts of interest involving research analysts. According to these rules, firms must have policies in place to prevent analysts from trading securities in a manner inconsistent with their published ratings, and must disclose any financial interests analysts may have in covered companies.

The settlement stems from alleged violations of FINRA rules regarding conflicts of interest involving research analysts. According to these rules, firms must have policies in place to prevent analysts from trading securities in a manner inconsistent with their published ratings, and must disclose any financial interests analysts may have in covered companies.
Between January 2016 and August 2019, Barclays purportedly failed to establish and maintain a supervisory system, including written procedures, to comply with these rules. Specifically, the firm neglected to adequately monitor its research analysts' managed brokerage accounts for compliance with trading restrictions or to ascertain if they held securities in covered companies. This failure resulted in the non-disclosure of analyst-held securities in 99 equity research reports, as well as the oversight of three instances where an analyst's external account manager traded against their published recommendations.
These actions led to violations of several FINRA rules, including 2241(b)(2)(J), 224l(c)(4)(A), 3110(a) and (b)(1), and 2010. Furthermore, Barclays' written supervisory procedures lacked a process to review securities transactions in analysts' external accounts for potential securities law violations, such as market manipulation and insider trading, thus contravening FINRA Rules 3110(d) and 2010.
Additionally, from April 2021 to March 2022, Barclays allegedly failed to gather data for certain clients of its affiliates to determine if disclosure of conflicts of interest was necessary in research reports. Consequently, the firm omitted disclosures in at least 803 reports covering 22 issuers, indicating affiliations and compensation received from issuers within the preceding 12 months, in violation of FINRA Rules 2241(c)(4)(D) and 2010.

Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.
Read more

Is Amillex Safe or a Scam? Understanding Rules and Security
You are asking an important question: Is Amillex safe or a scam? The simple answer is that Amillex works in an unclear area that needs careful study. It is not a complete scam like fake websites that steal your money right away, but it also does not meet the safety rules of the best, well-regulated brokers. Read on to explore more details.

Voices of the Golden Insight Award Jury | David Bily, Founder and CEO of Moneta Markets
WikiFX Golden Insight Award uniting industry forces to build a safe and healthy forex ecosystem, driving industry innovation and sustainable development, launches a new feature series — “Voices of the Golden Insight Awards Jury.” Through in-depth conversations with distinguished judges, this series explores the evolving landscape of the forex industry and the shared mission to promote innovation, ethics, and sustainability.

ASIC Launches Preliminary Investigation into Clime Australian Income Fund
The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) has launched a preliminary investigation into the Clime Australian Income Fund, examining whether the Fund’s Target Market Determination (TMD) and Product Disclosure Statement (PDS) comply with Australian financial regulations. The investigation will also assess whether any breaches of the law have occurred in relation to the Fund’s investment activities.

HSBC announced a $1.1 billion charge linked to the largest Ponzi scheme in financial history
The British banking giant HSBC Holdings Plc has announced a potential $1.1 billion charge connected to the long-running Bernard Madoff Ponzi scheme, following a legal ruling in Luxembourg. The claim stems from Herald Fund, a European investment fund that sued HSBC over alleged losses related to the Madoff fraud.
