简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
SEC Targets 4 Long Island Traders in $2 Million Fraud Scandal
Abstract:The Securities and Exchange Commission sets its sights on a group of Long Island traders, accusing them of orchestrating a multi-million-dollar fraud scheme, unravelling a web of deception in the world of securities trading.

In a recent development, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has levied allegations against Eduardo Hernandez, Christopher Flagg, Daquan Lloyd, and Corey Ortiz, individuals associated with Long Island, New York, accusing them of orchestrating a lucrative “free-riding” scheme over several years, amassing illicit gains surpassing $2 million.
The SEC contends that spanning approximately November 2018 to January 2022, the accused parties were engaged in what's known as a free-riding scheme. This dubious practice involves trading securities without possessing adequate funds to cover the transactions, a clear breach of regulatory standards.
According to the SEC's complaint, the defendants established unfunded brokerage accounts, often dubbed “loser accounts,” as part of their alleged scheme. These accounts served as vehicles for generating trading profits through matched trading with winner brokerage accounts under their purview.
Moreover, the complaint alleges that the defendants maintained these loser accounts at a brokerage firm offering instant deposit credit. Exploiting this credit, they purportedly financed trades within loser accounts through manipulated prices with winner accounts, often using thinly-traded options to execute their manoeuvres.

The crux of the alleged wrongdoing lies in the defendants' purported transfer of credit provided by the broker from loser accounts to winner accounts. This manoeuvre, as claimed, enabled them to accumulate guaranteed profits at the brokerage's expense. It's estimated that over the relevant period, the defendants utilized at least 600 brokerage accounts to repeatedly execute their purportedly fraudulent scheme.
In response to these allegations, the SEC has taken legal action. The complaint, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York, brings charges against Hernandez and Flagg for violating antifraud provisions under Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rules 10b-5(a) and (c) thereunder. Additionally, they are accused of further violations by allegedly acting through or with the assistance of another individual, a contravention of Exchange Act Section 20(b). Ortiz and Lloyd are implicated for aiding and abetting Hernandez's and Flagg's purported violations.
The SEC's legal pursuit aims to secure various forms of relief, including permanent injunctive relief, conduct-based injunctions, disgorgement coupled with prejudgment interest, and imposition of civil penalties.
This unfolding narrative underscores the intricate interplay between regulatory oversight and financial malfeasance, shedding light on the challenges posed by illicit schemes in the realm of securities trading. As legal proceedings unfold, the ramifications of these allegations will undoubtedly reverberate across the financial landscape.

Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.
Read more

VARIANSE Review: Traders Raise Deposit & Withdrawal Issues and High Commission & Swap Charges
Are you losing both while depositing and withdrawing your capital at VARIANSE? Does the broker give the currency conversion rate excuse for this? Have you been trapped with spreads charged higher than promised? Do you bear steep commission and swap charges at this broker? Traders frequently report these trading issues online. In today’s VARIANSE broker review, we have shared some trading complaints that have grabbed everyone’s attention. Take a look.

Is Fyntura a Regulated Broker? A Complete 2025 Broker Review
Fyntura is a broker accused by many users of posting fake reviews and running paid promotions with influencers to attract unsuspecting traders. Several users have faced withdrawal issues, blocked accounts, and manipulated trades. These are the real complaints and experiences shared by traders online. In this latest Fyntura Review 2025, you’ll learn about genuine user feedback, reported issues, and the broker’s credibility helping you make a better trading decision.

Zetradex Exposed: Withdrawal Denials, Account Freeze & Bonus Issues Hurt Traders
Do you constantly face withdrawal denials by Zetradex? Does the forex broker keep freezing your account and wiping out your capital? Have you also undergone issues concerning the Zetradex no deposit bonus? These trading issues have become apparent as the forex broker allegedly scams traders all over. In this Zetradex review article, we have demonstrated some complaints. Read them to get a feel of what happens to traders here.

Fullerton Markets Review: Traders Allege Profit Wipes and Illegitimate Withdrawal Rates
Have you witnessed constant profit deletion from Fullerton Markets? Has the Saint Vincent and the Grenadines-based forex broker wiped out all your capital after you checked it on Fullerton Markets Login? Do you find the deposit and withdrawal rates abnormal here? These complaints have been grabbing everyone’s attention on Fullerton Markets Review Platforms. In this article, we have shared some of these complaints for you to look at and inspect. Read on!
