简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
Abstract:Learn about the most complained-about online trading brokers in March 2024 through WikiFX reports, underscoring the critical need for choosing regulated and reliable investment platforms.
After taking into consideration the fact that trading online is a serious industry, it is of the utmost importance to choose a broker who can be trustworthy. Unfortunately, not everything was peachy. Some business owners fell into a con. In March 2024, the brokers that gathered the most complaints, according to WikiFX exposure reports, a portal that exposes forex fraud, are listed below.
A distressed Filipino trader spoke up about their terrible experience with V5 Forex Global, stating the company was a fraud that drained their funds. Because of an unforeseen automated deal closure on May 23, 2023, they lost all the money in their account. The trader tried to reach out to V5 Forex's support personnel many times, but their requests for explanations and compensation went unmet. This case shows that the broker isn't trustworthy and doesn't care about its customers, which is a major red flag.
Another Filipino trader who complained to Orfinex highlighted the disturbing lack of attention to customer concerns, particularly about the Know Your Customer (KYC) procedure. This trader's claims that Orfinex was involved in a fraud scheme show how careless the company is with its customers' money and data.
Case 1: Turkey
An ordeal that a Turkish trader had to go through with Ventezo Limited was the denial of a withdrawal request for $8,618. Nothing had changed despite my repeated questions and cries for help; Ventezo's answer had been mediocre. There are valid concerns about Ventezo's dedication to its customers and its reliability in handling this matter.
Case 2: Philippines
Even worse is an incident involving the national manager of Ventezo in the Philippines, who accessed funds improperly and engaged in illicit activity. The complaint and their brother-in-law were both affected by the illicit transaction, which was a betrayal of confidence and an indication of significant security holes inside Ventezo. After failing to resolve the issue through direct communication with the company's CEO, victims endured financial losses and lost faith in the broker.
The lack of regulation of these brokers is behind many of these accusations. Unlicensed businesses are not regulated like licensed brokers, raising the risk of fraud.
In March 2024, victim testimonies made the frightening realities of internet trading with unlicensed brokers clear to the general public. In the ever-growing world of foreign currency, it is essential to be informed and carefully consider all aspects. Traders who want to make it through this maze should put their money on trustworthy platforms, have helpful customer service, and, most importantly, follow all the rules.
Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.
Robinhood Crypto debuts Ethereum staking for European users with a 100% earnings match up to €10,000. Simplified staking makes earning rewards effortless.
The Philippines enforces new virtual asset reporting rules starting January 2025, mandating 13 comprehensive reports from VASPs to ensure transparency and security.
Kraken shuts down its NFT marketplace to focus on new products and services, citing the NFT market downturn. Resources shift to stablecoins and institutional solutions.
Webull Financial, alongside Lightspeed Financial Services Group and Paulson Investment Company, LLC, has agreed to pay a collective fine of $275,000 following an investigation by the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The penalty was issued due to the firms’ failure to include essential information in suspicious activity reports (SARs) over a four-year period.