简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
Oppenheimer & Co. fined $450,000 for violating Cboe rules
Abstract:Oppenheimer & Co. Inc., a prominent financial institution, recently entered into a settlement agreement with Cboe Exchange, Inc., incurring a $450,000 fine. This settlement arises from alleged breaches of Exchange Rules spanning from January 1, 2017, to approximately September 15, 2021. In this article, we will delve into the particulars of the case, the issues in question, and the measures taken by Oppenheimer to address the situation.

Oppenheimer & Co. Inc., a prominent financial institution, recently entered into a settlement agreement with Cboe Exchange, Inc., incurring a $450,000 fine. This settlement arises from alleged breaches of Exchange Rules spanning from January 1, 2017, to approximately September 15, 2021. In this article, we will delve into the particulars of the case, the issues in question, and the measures taken by Oppenheimer to address the situation.
During the specified period, Oppenheimer faced accusations related to its reporting practices concerning the Large Options Position Report system (LOPR). It was reported that in at least 809,000 instances, the firm either failed to report or inaccurately reported positions to LOPR when their system did not recognize certain customers' accounts acting in concert, commonly referred to as “AIC.” When an account held positions with fewer than 200 options contracts, Oppenheimer's LOPR reporting system failed to consolidate the account with others acting in concert, resulting in the failure to report approximately 21,000 positions to LOPR in about 370,000 instances.
Furthermore, when an account or AIC group held options positions exceeding 200 contracts, Oppenheimer's LOPR reporting system erroneously omitted the aggregation of the account with others in concert, leading to approximately 29,000 positions being reported to LOPR with inaccurate AIC information in roughly 439,000 instances.
Oppenheimer also faced criticism for not establishing a supervisory system with written supervisory procedures (WSPs) designed to reasonably prevent and detect violations of LOPR reporting rules for accounts acting in concert. While WSPs were in place during the Relevant Period, their focus primarily centered on identifying AIC relationships at the account's inception and did not account for changes in AIC relationships. Additionally, Oppenheimer lacked a system for follow-up and review to identify changes in AIC relationships or verify that the AIC information reported to LOPR matched the information stored in customer account records.
Oppenheimer's Response
Oppenheimer & Co. Inc. has neither admitted nor denied the alleged violations but has consented to the terms of the settlement. The firm has initiated efforts to rectify the LOPR reporting issue by September 15, 2021. While the settlement entails a substantial financial penalty of $450,000, it also includes a censure.
Conclusion
The settlement between Oppenheimer & Co. Inc. and Cboe Exchange, Inc. underscores the significance of accurate and punctual reporting within the financial industry. While Oppenheimer has accepted the fine and censure without admitting wrongdoing, this case serves as a reminder to financial institutions regarding the necessity of maintaining robust reporting systems and supervisory procedures to ensure compliance with regulatory requirements. Additionally, it emphasizes the importance of promptly addressing any deficiencies in reporting practices to uphold the integrity of the financial markets.

Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.
Read more

WikiEXPO Dubai 2025 “Welcome Party” Kicks Off Tonight!
In anticipation of the upcoming WikiEXPO Dubai 2025, the WikiEXPO Organizing Committee has specially arranged a high-end social gathering—the “Welcome Party”. The event will be grandly held on the evening of Monday, Nov 10, on the 6th Floor, Conrad Dubai, UAE.

Charles Schwab Review: Traders Claim Illegitimate Profit Cancellation, Trade Manipulation & More
Have you been lured into the Charles Schwab app for trading on the back of outrageous profit claims by the broker? Did you fail to receive any of these? Does the broker deny withdrawals every time you request and cancel your forex trading account? Have you been victimized financially by its trade manipulation? Act before you are left with a NIL balance in your account. Many traders have questioned Charles Schwab customer service and many other operational executives for the aforementioned illegitimate trading activities. In this Charles Schwab review article, we have shared some of their comments. Read on!

AMP Futures Exposed: Traders Raise Alarms Over Illegitimate Account Blocks & Bad Customer Service
Has AMP Futures blocked your forex trading account? Does it fail to provide any explanation for this act? Do you face issues concerning deposits to your AMP Futures account? Is the customer service non-existent for any trading query you raise with it? You are not alone! Many traders have been facing these issues upon AMP Futures login. Some of them have commented on AMP Futures review platforms. In this article, we have shared some reviews that you can look at. Read on!

FXGlory Review: Vanishing Profits, Capital Scams & Withdrawal Charges Keep Annoying Traders
Does FXGlory remove all your forex trading account balances upon fund withdrawal requests? Or do you witness incorrect trading account balances after fund withdrawals? Does the Saint Lucia-based forex broker charge you for fund withdrawals? All these and many more scam-related complaints have been filed against the forex broker. In this FXGlory review article, we will discuss several complaints. Read on!

