简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
WIKIFX REPORT: CYSEC SLAPS €150,000 FINE ON FXBFI, OPERATOR OF 101INVESTING BRAND
Abstract:The Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission (CySEC) today announced that it has reached a settlement with FXBFI Broker Financial Invest Ltd, trading as 101investing, ordering the firm to pay €150,000 for violating the Investment Services and Activities and Regulated Markets Law.

In relation to the fine, CySEC said the violations related to non-compliance with the Directive DI144-2014-14, and in particular with the authorisation conditions laid down in the articles 5 (1), 24, 25 and 26 (3). According to the watchdogs statement, these terms concern certain authorisation conditions and organisational requirements with which a CIF is required to comply.
CySEC has further explained that the settlement resolves allegations of non-compliance with other articles that cover multiple regulatory requirements, including conflicts of interest and information provided to clients.
In addition, FXBFI was probed by Cysec for lack of compliance with regulatory requirements that govern the assessment of suitability and appropriateness of clients, as well as its obligation to execute orders on the most favourable terms to their customers.
To stay on top of compliance, Cypriot brokers have to gain insights into the financial situation of the client, including his investment knowledge, experience, and objectives. The genesis of these requirements lies in Markets in Financial Instruments Directive (MiFID II) regulation.
FXBFI is regulated by CySEC and therefore has to comply with Cypriot regulations in order to maintain its CIF trading license, which enables the broker to offer its services across Europe.
As a result of the CySECs audits conducted between February to August 2020, several types of violations were found in five compliance areas. The following hierarchy of problems running from most common to least common was observed, according to the watchdog:
Article 5(1) of the Law regarding the requirement for CIF authorization.
Article 24 of the Law regarding conflicts of interest.
Article 25, sections (1) and (3), of the Law regarding the general principles and information addressed to clients.
Article 26(3)(a) of the Law regarding the assessment of suitability and appropriateness and reporting to clients.
Paragraph 21(g) of the Directive DI144-2014-14regarding the variable elements of remuneration
Following such settlements, CySEC often orders the company to take corrective measures within a set framework. However, the regulator confirmed that FXBFI already paid the settlement fees and since such agreements are usually announced within six months of an inspection, the majority of issues should have already been resolved.
Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.
Read more

JP Markets Review: High Spread & Commission, Fake Bonus Lure & Withdrawal Hassles Frustrate Traders
Have you been lured into opening a JP Markets Forex Trading Account with a high bonus offer that never existed? Have you found the spread and commission charges higher on JP Markets Login than what’s advertised on the broker’s website? Wondering why you are not able to withdraw funds from your trading account? Well, all of these hint at a potential forex investment scam. Many traders have expressed their disappointment while sharing the JP Markets Review online. In this article, we have shared certain complaints. Take a look at them.

Angel one 2025 Review & Complaints
Angel One is a well-known name in the forex market. People are familiar with the name , but is this broker really worth your interest? What do real users say about Angel One, and what complaints have they shared? In this Angel One 2025 review, you will explore all these details.

Exclusive Markets Under the Scanner: Traders Report High Swap Charges, Deposit Discrepancies & More
Is your forex trading account experience at Exclusive Markets far from good? Do you witness high swap fees and daily charges? Does the deposit fail to reflect in your Exclusive Markets Login? Don’t receive adequate response from the customer support official on your trading queries? You are not alone! Traders have already alleged that the forex broker is involved in these activities. In this Exclusive Markets WikiFX review article, we shared some traders’ comments. Read on to know about them.

Interactive Brokers Fined for FINRA Market Data Lapses
Interactive Brokers fined $150,000 by FINRA over Vendor Display Rule violations and supervisory gaps; firm adds real-time consolidated data displays.
