Liquidchart

According to WikiFX data, Liquidchart holds a low overall score of 1.37, reflecting a lack of regulatory oversight. The broker operates from the United Kingdom but is classified under a suspicious operational region and holds no valid forex trading licenses. This absence of credible regulatory supervision places the firm in a high-risk category, and traders should exercise extreme caution when considering this platform.

No, Liquidchart is not regulated by any known financial authority. The license list shows no active forex licenses, and the regulatory index is zero. The broker is not subject to oversight from bodies such as the FCA, ASIC, or CySEC, which means there is no official recourse for traders in case of disputes.

Liquidchart does not publicly disclose a minimum deposit requirement for its account types. The account details do not specify an entry condition or minimum cash amount, so traders would need to contact the broker directly for this information.

Liquidchart does not explicitly state whether it supports MetaTrader 4 or MetaTrader 5. The platform’s software index is marked as not available, and no trading platform details are provided in the public data. Traders should verify available platforms directly with the broker.

Pro: Liquidchart offers three account types (Silver, Gold, Platinum) with maximum leverages ranging from 1:200 to 1:400, and supports scalping, EA trading, and position locking. Cons: The broker is unregulated and operates without any valid forex license, its WikiFX score is a low 1.37, and it is classified as a suspicious operational region, raising significant concerns about security and transparency.

WikiFX data does not currently show any significant user complaints or negative exposure for Liquidchart. However, the absence of complaints does not imply safety, especially given the broker’s unregulated status and low score.

Liquidchart is not regulated by US authorities such as the SEC or CFTC, and its registration in the UK along with a suspicious operational region classification suggests it is unlikely to offer services to US residents. Specific availability has not been publicly confirmed, so traders should verify with the broker and consult local regulations.

Due to its unregulated status, low WikiFX score of 1.37, and classification as a suspicious operational region, Liquidchart is not considered suitable for beginner traders. Novice traders typically require brokers with strong regulatory oversight, transparent fee structures, and robust investor protection, all of which are absent here.

Liquidchart offers three account types: Silver, Gold, and Platinum. The Silver account provides a maximum leverage of 1:200, the Gold account offers 1:300, and the Platinum account allows up to 1:400. All accounts support scalping, EA trading, and position locking, but no minimum deposit or spread details are publicly disclosed.

Liquidchart offers maximum leverages of 1:200 on the Silver account, 1:300 on the Gold account, and 1:400 on the Platinum account. While high leverage can amplify potential profits, it also significantly increases risk. Combined with the broker’s lack of regulation and low safety score, the risk profile is elevated, and traders should be especially cautious.

A cloned broker website refers to a fraudulent website that imitates the information of a legitimate broker. Such websites usually copy the real company's brand name, page design, and even regulatory information to mislead investors into making deposits. Common features include: a domain name highly similar to the official website (such as slight spelling differences), abnormal or unverifiable contact information, and promises of unusually high returns. Once funds enter such platforms, they are usually difficult to recover. Investors can identify potential risks by checking the official domain name, verifying regulatory information, and using WikiFX for cross-verification.

WikiFX is a third-party platform that provides forex broker information inquiry and risk alerts. This type of platform mainly integrates brokers' regulatory information, user feedback, and historical records, and conducts comprehensive evaluation through a multi-dimensional model to help investors quickly understand the broker's basic situation and potential risks. By using such tools, investors can conduct preliminary screening before choosing a broker, thereby reducing decision-making risks caused by information asymmetry.

A broker can be evaluated as a potential scam platform by considering multiple factors such as regulatory qualifications, user complaints, fund security, and platform data. In general, brokers without valid regulation, those that frequently have withdrawal problems, those with a large number of user complaints, or those providing false information usually carry higher risks. You can check the broker's regulatory status, overall rating, exposure records, and user reviews on the WikiFX platform, and make judgments based on multi-dimensional data to effectively identify and avoid scam platform risks.

Common forex regulatory authorities include the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) in the United Kingdom, the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC), the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) and the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) in the United States, the Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission (CySEC), and the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS). These regulatory authorities usually maintain relatively high regulatory standards, and brokers regulated by them generally have higher compliance levels. You can check broker ranking lists under different regulators on the WikiFX platform, such as brokers regulated by FCA, ASIC, and CySEC, so as to compare brokers under different regulatory backgrounds more clearly and make safer choices.

If a broker holds multiple regulatory licenses, it usually means that it operates in multiple countries or regions and needs to comply with the requirements of different regulatory authorities. Its overall credibility is generally higher. However, it should be noted that regulatory strength differs between licenses. Some offshore regulations have weaker restrictions, so safety should not be judged only by the number of licenses. It is recommended to focus on whether the broker holds licenses from major regulators such as FCA or ASIC, and evaluate its regulatory status, historical records, and overall rating together. You can also check all regulatory information and performance under different regulators on the WikiFX platform to more comprehensively assess its actual risk level.