Mazi Finance Scam Exposure: A Warning to Indian Traders
Latest India Mazi Finance scam: Failed XAUUSD execution despite margin, costing $675—fake “insufficient balance” excuse. Protect funds, read the full report now!
简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
Abstract:Interactive Brokers (also known as 盈透证券) is a prominent brokerage with significant global influence, holding an AAA Influence Rank and a WikiFX score of 8.29. Established in 2002 and headquartered in Hong Kong, the broker serves clients across major markets including Australia, the US, China, and the UK.

Interactive Brokers (also known as 盈透证券) is a prominent brokerage with significant global influence, holding an AAA Influence Rank and a WikiFX score of 8.29. Established in 2002 and headquartered in Hong Kong, the broker serves clients across major markets including Australia, the US, China, and the UK.
While the broker boasts top-tier licenses and a strong market position, its regulatory record is mixed, featuring both active licenses and significant fines from major financial authorities. This review analyzes its regulatory framework, user complaints, and trading environment to determine its safety.
Interactive Brokers holds licenses from several top-tier financial regulators, positioning it as a heavily supervised entity. However, the status of these licenses varies, with some flagged abnormalities.
| Regulator | Country | License Type | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| FCA (Financial Conduct Authority) | UK | Market Maker/STP | Regulated |
| ASIC (Australian Securities & Investments Commission) | Australia | MM | Regulated |
| ASIC (Australian Securities & Investments Commission) | Australia | MM | Revoked (License 000245574) |
| CIRO (Investment Industry Regulatory Organization) | Canada | Common Finance | Regulated |
| FSA (Financial Services Agency) | Japan | Retail Forex | Regulated |
| NFA (National Futures Association) | USA | Common Finance | Exceeded |
Key Regulatory Notes:
Data indicates that Interactive Brokers has faced penalties from multiple regulators, which traders should consider:
Despite its high score and regulation, WikiFX has received 12 complaints in the last 3 months. The casesText highlights specific issues reported by users in Hong Kong and Vietnam.
Warning: Traders should be vigilant about verifying they are dealing with the official website, as high-profile brands are often impersonated.
Interactive Brokers does not use the standard MetaTrader (MT4/5) ecosystem. Instead, it utilizes a Self-Developed (Proprietary) Platform.
Interactive Brokers offers extensive global support, covering 31 languages and 15 regions.
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| ✅ Regulated by Top-Tier Bodies (FCA, ASIC, CIRO, FSA) | ❌ Multiple Regulatory Fines reported (ASIC, NFA, FCA) |
| ✅ Global Presence: AAA Influence Rank | ❌ User Complaints: 12 recent complaints regarding withdrawals |
| ✅ Extensive Support: 31 Languages supported | ❌ Platform Restrictions: No MT4/5; Proprietary software only |
| ✅ Transparency: Clear fee reports on platform | ❌ License Issues: Some licenses marked as “Revoked” or “Exceeded” |
Interactive Brokers is a legitimate industry giant with an 8.29 WikiFX Score and regulation from the world's strictest financial authorities (FCA, ASIC, FSA). However, safety is not absolute. The broker's record includes significant fines for compliance failures, and recent user complaints highlight issues with account freezes and withdrawals in certain regions.
Recommendation: While the broker is generally considered safe for institutional and professional traders due to its strong regulatory backing, retail traders should be aware of the proprietary platform's learning curve and the strict compliance checks that may affect account access.
Protect Your Capital: Before depositing with Interactive Brokers, verify the URL matches the official regulatory records to avoid clones. Use the WikiFX App to check the latest license status and read real-time user reviews.
Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.

Latest India Mazi Finance scam: Failed XAUUSD execution despite margin, costing $675—fake “insufficient balance” excuse. Protect funds, read the full report now!

Does Pemaxx prevent you from withdrawing funds once you make profits? Has the Mauritius-based forex broker disabled your trading account upon your withdrawal request? Do you fail to withdraw funds despite meeting the trading lot requirements? These scam-like trading activities have allegedly become a part of the broker’s operation, as many traders have complained about them online. In this Pemaxx review article, we have highlighted their comments against the forex broker. Keep reading!

Did Fortune Prime Global deduct all your profits by accusing you of market manipulation? Are you struggling to access withdrawals for months? Has the forex broker disabled your forex trading account upon the withdrawal application? Does the broker stipulate tax payments as a condition for fund withdrawals? You are not alone! In this Fortune Prime Global review article, we have highlighted these complaints. Read on!

UNIGLOBEMARKET presents a mixed picture that demands careful consideration from prospective traders, earning an overall rating of 5.5 out of 10 with a "Use with Caution" designation. Based on 55 trader reviews, the broker shows a concerning 40% negative rate, though it's worth noting that positive reviews still outnumber negative ones with 31 favorable assessments compared to 22 unfavorable ones. Read on for an insightful review.