”New Traders Launch Pad” Initiative
Bravely Share Your First Trade
简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
Abstract:FINRA fined and censured United Capital Markets $25,000 for supervisory gaps and unapproved, exaggerated retail communications in 2018–2019.

FINRA has censured and fined United Capital Markets $25,000 after finding the firm failed to maintain a reasonable supervisory system over a senior executives equities and options trading and circulated unapproved retail communications with exaggerated claims between 2018 and 2019, in violation of FINRA Rules 3110, 2210, and 2010.
FINRA determined that from January 2018 to December 2019, the firm lacked written supervisory procedures that designated who oversaw a senior executive‘s trading in equities and options, leaving the executive effectively supervising personal activity without documented controls required under Rule 3110(a)–(b). The WSPs also omitted any guidance for supervising equities and options activity, meaning there were no procedures for monitoring the executive’s trades in those product areas, a failure cited as contrary to Rules 3110 and 2010.

Between January 2018 and February 2019, UCM distributed eight retail communications that were not pre‑reviewed and approved by a qualified principal as required by Rule 2210, and the materials included language deemed exaggerated and not fair and balanced. Examples included characterizations such as “TRADE OF THE CENTURY” and claims that a company was “best in the world,” which FINRA found violated the content standards of Rule 2210(d) and the high‑level conduct rule, 2010.
Under the settlement, United Capital Markets accepted a censure and a $25,000 fine tied to the supervisory and communications violations identified by FINRA. UCM has been a FINRA member since June 1996, employs 10 registered representatives at its Miami, Florida headquarters, and focuses primarily on debt securities, despite the cited gaps relating to equities and options oversight.
The case underscores that Rule 3110 requires explicit responsibility mapping and product‑specific procedures, especially where senior personnel might otherwise oversee their own activity. It also reinforces that retail communications must be approved by a qualified principal before use and must present balanced, accurate claims under Rule 2210s content standards.

Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.

Bravely Share Your First Trade

Do you have to constantly witness trade delays on the EO Broker trading platform? Have you encountered cases of unfair trade executions where you have recorded heavy losses? Are inconsistent spreads eating into your trading gains? Is the EO Broker withdrawal process too slow? Is the customer support team incompetent in resolving all these trading queries? You are not alone! Many traders have vehemently opposed the broker’s tactics on review platforms. We have highlighted different EO Broker reviews in this article. Read on!

Achiever FX has been receiving flak for numerous reasons, including slow-paced trade execution, lack of transparency, and, importantly, alleged attempts to defraud traders. With its customer support team not able to resolve these issues, traders have allegedly been left alone! They have rightly reviewed the Saint Lucia-based forex broker negatively online. In this Achiever FX review article, we have explored complaints against the forex broker. Keep reading to know the same.

Alpari艾福瑞's notably low overall rating of 2.52 out of 10 raises immediate red flags for traders seeking a reliable forex broker. While the broker has generated sufficient market presence to accumulate 218 documented reviews, the available data presents an unusually opaque picture of their operational strengths and weaknesses. This lack of clear performance metrics across key service areas makes it challenging to provide specific insights into their trading conditions, platform reliability, or customer service quality. Read on for more information.