简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
OctaFX Update: Crypto Deposit Restrictions Raise Regulatory Concerns
Abstract:Malaysian traders using OctaFX Malaysia should take note of a significant update affecting their accounts. As of 18 August 2025, the broker has disabled deposits via Ethereum (ETH) and Bitcoin (BTC) for clients in Malaysia.

Malaysian traders using OctaFX Malaysia should take note of a significant update affecting their accounts. As of 18 August 2025, the broker has disabled deposits via Ethereum (ETH) and Bitcoin (BTC) for clients in Malaysia. This restriction applies only to deposits, while withdrawals in these cryptocurrencies will continue as usual.
At first glance, OctaFX presents itself as a long-established, professional broker with a strong international presence. Its sleek website, diverse range of trading instruments, and claims of regulatory oversight often reassure traders. However, a closer OctaFX review conducted by WikiFX reveals a different story.

The Securities Commission of Malaysia (SC) has officially placed OctaFX on its Investor Alert List. The regulators notice states that OctaFX has been conducting derivative trading activities without a valid licence and operating a recognised market without authorisation. This means that, despite its global reputation, OctaFX is currently operating in Malaysia without proper approval from the SC.

Globally, OctaFX does hold a licence with the Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission (CySEC) under licence number 372/18, registered as a market maker. While this offers a degree of legitimacy in Europe, it does not cover operations in Malaysia. This is where many investors misunderstand the concept of regulation. Being licensed in one jurisdiction does not automatically mean a broker is authorised everywhere.

For Malaysian traders, this distinction is crucial. A brokers regulation is only effective in the regions where it is recognised. In the case of OctaFX Malaysia, clients lack the local protections that come with dealing through an SC-approved broker. This exposes traders to risks such as limited recourse in cases of disputes, delayed fund recovery, or potential malpractice.
In every circumstance, investors should not only verify whether a broker is regulated, but also ensure that it is authorised specifically within Malaysias legal framework.

Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.
Read more

In-Depth Uniglobe Markets Commission Fees and Spreads Analysis – What Traders Should Really Know
For experienced traders, the cost of execution is a critical factor in broker selection. Low spreads, fair commissions, and transparent pricing can be the difference between a profitable and a losing strategy over the long term. This has led many to scrutinize the offerings of brokers like Uniglobe Markets, which presents a tiered account structure promising competitive conditions. However, a professional evaluation demands more than a surface-level look at marketing claims. It requires a deep, data-driven analysis of the real trading costs, set against the backdrop of the broker's operational integrity and safety. This comprehensive Uniglobe Markets commission fees and spreads analysis will deconstruct the broker's pricing model, examining its account types, typical spreads, commission policies, and potential ancillary costs. Using data primarily sourced from the global broker inquiry platform WikiFX, we will provide a clear-eyed view of the Uniglobe Markets spreads commissions prici

In-Depth Review of Stonefort Securities Regulation and Oversight – A Trader's Guide to the Risks
For experienced traders, the process of selecting a new broker transcends a simple comparison of spreads and leverage. It is a meticulous due diligence exercise where the integrity of the broker's regulatory framework is paramount. Stonefort Securities, a relatively new entrant in the crowded brokerage space, presents a complex and often contradictory profile. On one hand, it boasts a modern MT5 platform and a stream of positive user testimonials. On the other hand, it is shadowed by severe regulatory warnings that question the very foundation of its operations. This in-depth review focuses on the core issue for any long-term trader: Stonefort Securities regulation and oversight. We will dissect the broker's corporate structure, scrutinize its licensing claims, and analyze what the data implies for trader protection and fund security. For traders evaluating whether Stonefort Securities is a trustworthy partner, understanding these details is not just important—it is essential.

FXPesa Review: Are Traders Facing High Slippage, Fund Losses & Withdrawal Denials?
Do FXPesa support officials fail to pick up your calls when you raise fund withdrawal requests with the broker? But are these officials always open to you regarding fund deposits? Do you frequently spot slippage and stop-loss order execution errors on the FXPesa login? These issues are increasingly becoming common with this forex broker. Consequently, many traders have expressed their dissatisfaction with the broker online. In this FXPesa Review article, we have shared some of these complaints. Take a look!

WikiFX's New Evaluation of ATM Capital LTD: Does its License Protect the Arab Investor?
WikiFX Evaluation reveals that ATM Capital LTD only scored 1.92 points. Check the company's unverified license and the risks of Arab investment.

