简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
D. Boral Capital agrees to a fine as a settlement with FINRA
Abstract:On August 6, 2025, the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) announced that D. Boral Capital agreed to a censure and a $125,000 fine as part of a settlement for failing to maintain the minimum required net capital.

On August 6, 2025, the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) announced that D. Boral Capital agreed to a censure and a $125,000 fine as part of a settlement for failing to maintain the minimum required net capital.
Net Capital Shortfalls (July 2020–May 2024)
Between July 2020 and May 2024, D. Boral Capital conducted securities business on 96 separate days while failing to maintain its minimum required net capital. These deficiencies violated the Securities Exchange Act. These standards are designed to ensure brokers have sufficient liquid assets to meet obligations to customers.
Inadequate Supervisory Procedures
During the same period, the firm did not establish or maintain written supervisory procedures reasonably designed to ensure compliance with net capital requirements.D. Boral Capital failed to file or timely file the required corporate offering documents. These omissions violated FINRA Rule 5110, which governs filing requirements for underwriting and distribution activities, as well as FINRA Rule 2010.
Sanctions and Settlement Terms
- Censure: A formal public reprimand by FINRA.
- Fine: $125,000 payable by D. Boral Capital.
- No admissions: As is customary in FINRA settlements, the firm consented to the sanctions without admitting or denying the findings.
About D. Boral Capital
- FINRA Membership: Since 2000.
- Location: Headquartered in New York, NY, with two branch offices.
- Staff: 35 registered representatives.
- Business Model: Full-service brokerage primarily serving institutional clients.
Why It Matters
Maintaining minimum net capital and adhering to robust supervisory procedures is critical for broker-dealers to:
Protect Customers: Ensures firms can meet withdrawal and settlement obligations.
Support Market Integrity: Reduces the risk of disorderly liquidations.
Avoid Regulatory Action: Noncompliance can lead to costly fines and reputational harm.
The D. Boral Capital case underscores the importance of continuous monitoring and timely reporting in the brokerage industry. Firms should review their net capital calculations and WSPs regularly, and they must stay vigilant when participating in corporate offerings to meet all filing deadlines.

Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.
Read more

The 5%ers Review: Is it a Scam or Legit? Find Out from These Trader Comments
Did you face reduced leverage and hiked fees without any explanation from The 5%ers broker? Do you find The 5%er rules strange for getting a funded account from this prop trading firm? Has the broker closed your trade inappropriately, preventing you from making gains in the forex market? All these allegations have dominated The 5%ers review segment online. Looking at this, the WikiFX team investigated and found some startling comments against the broker. In this article, we have shared those complaints. Read on!

BROKSTOCK Exposed: Traders Report Login Errors, Withdrawal Issues & Incompetent Customer Support
Is your BROKSTOCK trading account full of inefficiencies? Do the recurrent BROKSTOCK login errors prevent you from opening and shorting positions at a favorable price? Has the broker failed to honor your withdrawal requests? Do you face order execution price issues? Has the customer support service failed to resolve your queries? You are not alone! In this BROKSTOCK review article, we have shared some complaints that need a close introspection. Read on to explore them.

OmegaPro Review: Traders Flood Comment Sections with Withdrawal Denials & Scam Complaints
Has your deposit and withdrawal scenario worsened after the initial good experience at OmegaPro, a UK-based forex broker? Does the broker ask you to invest when withdrawing your funds? Did the broker officials trap you with their false promises of compound interest on your deposit? Have you found it impossible to transfer funds from your OmegaPro login to another broker’s account? Do you witness a lack of support when dealing with these unfortunate trading circumstances? These are no longer isolated complaints — they have allegedly become the reason for OmegaPro’s tarnished trust and reputation within the trading community. Read on as we share the OmegaPro review in this article.

Inzo Broker Review 2025: A Complete Look at Features, Costs and User Claims
Inzo Broker presents itself as a modern forex and CFD broker, started in 2021 and registered in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines. At first glance, it offers an attractive package for traders: access to the popular MetaTrader 5 (MT5) and cTrader platforms, different types of accounts for various budget levels, and a wide selection of assets to trade. These features are made to attract both new and experienced traders. However, a closer look shows a big difference between these advertised benefits and the real risks. The broker works under an offshore regulatory system, which gives limited protection to investors. More importantly, Inzo has collected many serious user complaints, especially about withdrawing funds and changing trading conditions unfairly. This mix of weak oversight and serious user claims creates a high-risk situation that potential clients must carefully think about. This review will break down these parts to give a clear, fact-based view.
