FCA-Regulated Forex Brokers Are Declining — 31 Platforms to Avoid
As of December 1, 2025, a total of 105 companies in the United Kingdom held CFD licences.
简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
Abstract:UK Gambling Commission fines Spreadex £2M for anti-money laundering and social responsibility breaches, marking its second major penalty in three years.

Spreadex Limited, a UK gambling company, must pay a $2.7 million (£2 million) fine for not following rules to prevent money laundering and keep players safe. The UK Gambling Commission investigated the company and found major problems in how it operated from September 2022 to November 2023.
In mid-2023, a routine check showed Spreadex wasn‘t doing enough to ensure safety. The company, which runs online casino games and sports betting, trusted customer-provided financial details without verifying them. For example, one new user deposited $85,310 (£64,000) soon after signing up. This large sum raised red flags, but Spreadex didn’t properly check where the money came from. That same user lost $66,648 (£50,000) in just one month, showing a lack of oversight.
The Gambling Commission also pointed out problems with how Spreadex handled players at risk. One customer hit a daily deposit cap of $4,452 (£3,340) on 12 days over two weeks. Instead of stepping in to check on the players well-being, Spreadex sent automated messages with no personal follow-up, missing a chance to help someone who might be struggling.
To fix these issues, Spreadex will face an outside review to check its anti-money laundering and player safety practices. This audit will make sure the company follows rules moving forward and avoids similar mistakes. The Commission stressed that gambling businesses need strong systems to protect players and keep the industry trustworthy.
This isn‘t Spreadex’s first run-in with regulators. In 2022, the company paid a $1.8 million (£1.36 million) penalty for similar failures, marking its second big violation in three years. Regulators are frustrated that Spreadex hasnt learned from past mistakes and warned that more slip-ups will bring tougher punishments.
John Pierce, who oversees enforcement at the Gambling Commission, said he was troubled by Spreadexs failure to act on warning signs. He criticized the company for relying too much on unverified customer information and not doing enough to support at-risk players. Pierce also urged better teamwork between the Gambling Commission and the Financial Conduct Authority to monitor activities in both gambling and financial trading.
The Gambling Commission‘s stance is firm: companies must have solid plans to spot and handle risks quickly. This fine puts pressure on Spreadex to improve its practices and show it can follow the rules. Regulators have made it clear that they won’t tolerate ongoing failures, and businesses that dont fix their problems will face harsher consequences.


Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.

As of December 1, 2025, a total of 105 companies in the United Kingdom held CFD licences.

Has Dbinvesting failed to honor your fund withdrawal requests? Did you notice that the broker remained fine when you were losing and turned worse as your numbers gained on the Dbinvesting login? Did the broker wipe out your profits and block your trading account? Many such allegations from users across India, the US and other regions have become headlines on broker review platforms such as WikiFX. To make it comprehensive, we have prepared an in-depth investigation report into user allegations, the company’s products and services, and, importantly, regulatory status, in this Dbinvesting review article.

Times are tough for the rupee as it again slipped to 95 against the USD towards the end of April 2026 after some gains due to the RBI-led interventions early this month. The depreciation is largely attributable to surging crude oil prices. The prices climbed to their 3-year high over the US-Iran conflict. On April 30, 2026, the rupee opened at 95.02 mark against the USD, sliding 0.2% from its previous day’s ending at 94.84 against the greenback. As the day progressed, it slipped further to a new record low of 95.32 against the USD, beating the earlier fall of 95.22 in March 2026.

When you ask, "Is AssetsFX legit?", you're asking an important question about keeping your funds safe. After looking at all the available information, the answer is concerning: AssetsFX shows serious risks that traders should worry about. Our research found multiple problems that can't be overlooked. WikiFX, a website that checks brokers worldwide, gives AssetsFX only 2.44 points out of 10. They also warn users: "Low score, please stay away!" This very low rating isn't random. It comes from two main problems: the company doesn't have proper licenses from respected authorities, and many users have complained about losing funds. This article will explain the evidence behind this rating, giving you the facts you need to make a smart choice and protect your investments.