简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
RM80 Million in Losses After ‘Islamic’ Scheme Falls Apart
Abstract:A group of 232 investors is urging Malaysian authorities to launch a comprehensive investigation into an Islamic investment scheme that reportedly incurred losses exceeding RM80 million. The scheme, marketed under the guise of Islamic Redeemable Preference Shares (IRPS), is now under scrutiny for alleged misrepresentation and regulatory breaches.

More than 230 investors are asking authorities in Malaysia to investigate a company that ran what was claimed to be a Shariah-compliant investment scheme. The company is believed to have caused losses of at least RM80 million.
The Malaysian International Humanitarian Organisation (MHO) said the scheme looked legitimate at first. It used the name of a well-known Shariah adviser and appeared to follow Islamic financial principles. These factors gave many people confidence to invest.
MHO Secretary-General Datuk Hishamuddin Hashim said the company promoted Islamic Redeemable Preference Shares (IRPS) through marketing agents. The scheme was advertised as being in line with Islamic law. It had Shariah compliance certificates and submitted an official document, called an Information Memorandum (IM), to the Securities Commission Malaysia (SC).
Many investors believed that this meant the scheme was approved by the SC. However, this was not the case. Hishamuddin explained that submitting an IM does not mean the investment is approved, and that it is only allowed for “sophisticated investors”, that is for people with a net asset value of at least RM3 million and who invest a minimum of RM250,000.

In this case, many investors were ordinary people, not qualified under the law. Some invested as little as RM50,000, well below the legal threshold. This raises serious questions about whether the scheme was being offered in a way that broke the rules.
One of the agents who helped market the scheme, Datuk Seri Mahadi Badrul Zaman, said he too was a victim. He claimed to have lost more than RM20.7 million after investing in two of the involved companies.
Mahadi is also known for being the husband of actress Heliza Helmi. His name and his company, AUF MBZ Consortium Plt, were listed last year on the Securities Commission's investor alert list. The SC stated this was because of “unlicensed capital market activities” involving unlisted public company shares.
There is now growing pressure for regulators to take action. MHO wants a full investigation into the scheme, including the role of the Shariah adviser named in the documents. It also wants authorities to investigate whether false advertising and fraud were involved.
Hishamuddin said the case involves the public interest, as the victims include professionals from the oil and gas industry and well-known corporate figures. He urged the SC to open an official investigation and refer the case to the Attorney-Generals Chambers for possible charges.
Meanwhile, the controversy has gained attention on social media. Actress Fathia Latiff previously accused Mahadi of cheating her by failing to deliver a house she paid for five years ago.

Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.
Read more

JP Markets Review: High Spread & Commission, Fake Bonus Lure & Withdrawal Hassles Frustrate Traders
Have you been lured into opening a JP Markets Forex Trading Account with a high bonus offer that never existed? Have you found the spread and commission charges higher on JP Markets Login than what’s advertised on the broker’s website? Wondering why you are not able to withdraw funds from your trading account? Well, all of these hint at a potential forex investment scam. Many traders have expressed their disappointment while sharing the JP Markets Review online. In this article, we have shared certain complaints. Take a look at them.

Exclusive Markets Under the Scanner: Traders Report High Swap Charges, Deposit Discrepancies & More
Is your forex trading account experience at Exclusive Markets far from good? Do you witness high swap fees and daily charges? Does the deposit fail to reflect in your Exclusive Markets Login? Don’t receive adequate response from the customer support official on your trading queries? You are not alone! Traders have already alleged that the forex broker is involved in these activities. In this Exclusive Markets WikiFX review article, we shared some traders’ comments. Read on to know about them.

Is Nash Markets Regulated or Risk? Truth About Nash Markets’ License & Withdrawal Issues
Nash Markets’ app is said to be a scam. The broker locked users’ accounts after they got verified and did not return their deposit money. Many real users have shared these complaints and reviews. In this 2025 Nash Markets review, you will read about the main complaints and real experiences from users.

Is Amillex Safe or a Scam? Understanding Rules and Security
You are asking an important question: Is Amillex safe or a scam? The simple answer is that Amillex works in an unclear area that needs careful study. It is not a complete scam like fake websites that steal your money right away, but it also does not meet the safety rules of the best, well-regulated brokers. Read on to explore more details.
