RM500,000 Gone: Lecturer Duped by Online Investment Scam
A 39-year-old lecturer in Kuantan has been defrauded of RM493,600 in a sophisticated online investment scam
简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
Abstract:CBEX, already exposed as a Ponzi scheme, is now demanding “activation fees,” further eroding public trust.

The embattled Nigerian crypto platform, Crypto Bridge Exchange (CBEX), has sparked renewed controversy by announcing a new withdrawal scheme that many users and experts have called into question. According to the latest update, users holding up to $1,000 in account balance must now pay a $100 activation fee in order to withdraw just 50% of their original funds. CBEX claims that these partial reimbursements will be released by June 20, 2025.
This requirement raises serious concerns. For a platform that has been accused of misappropriating funds from over 600,000 Nigerian users, charging a fee upfront in exchange for a partial payout only months later appears not only unreasonable but also highly suspicious. Critics argue that it may serve as a tactic to extract even more money from already defrauded victims.
As previously reported by WikiFX, CBEX gained popularity in Nigeria by promoting itself as a high-return digital asset platform. Investors were promised a 100% return within 30 days, often with added incentives for referrals. In reality, CBEX operated under a classic Ponzi structure—using new deposits to pay out earlier participants—until it abruptly froze withdrawals in April and went silent.
The original report on CBEXs collapse and fraudulent operations can be found here:
Many victims have since taken to social media to share their stories of lost savings, with some staging protests in cities like Lagos and Ibadan. The Nigerian Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has already declared CBEX illegal, but no formal investigations have been confirmed.
CBEXs latest offer has done little to rebuild trust. The notion that investors must pay to recover their own money—only partially and after a long delay—has been widely interpreted as a red flag. Financial analysts warn that such tactics are common in “exit scam” phases of fraudulent platforms.
Users are strongly advised to exercise caution and avoid making further payments to CBEX under the promise of recovery. For those seeking more information or clarity on the CBEX case, WikiFX will continue to track developments as they unfold.
Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.

A 39-year-old lecturer in Kuantan has been defrauded of RM493,600 in a sophisticated online investment scam

Do you have to constantly witness trade delays on the EO Broker trading platform? Have you encountered cases of unfair trade executions where you have recorded heavy losses? Are inconsistent spreads eating into your trading gains? Is the EO Broker withdrawal process too slow? Is the customer support team incompetent in resolving all these trading queries? You are not alone! Many traders have vehemently opposed the broker’s tactics on review platforms. We have highlighted different EO Broker reviews in this article. Read on!

Achiever FX has been receiving flak for numerous reasons, including slow-paced trade execution, lack of transparency, and, importantly, alleged attempts to defraud traders. With its customer support team not able to resolve these issues, traders have allegedly been left alone! They have rightly reviewed the Saint Lucia-based forex broker negatively online. In this Achiever FX review article, we have explored complaints against the forex broker. Keep reading to know the same.

UbitMarkets review reveals no valid license and direct links to a fraudulent project, raising serious concerns over investor fund safety.