简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
FCA Highlights Risks in Trading Apps Used by Young and Frequent Traders
Abstract:A new FCA report finds that trading app features may drive excessive trading among younger users, with some platforms lacking adequate checks for high-risk products.

The UK Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has released a multi-firm review and behavioral research highlighting key risks associated with trading apps, particularly those used by young and frequent traders.
Key Findings on Business Models and Engagement Practices
The review covered 12 trading app providers, revealing diverse business models. Some acted as introducers, directing users to affiliated platforms. Revenue streams included commission, subscription fees, and interest from idle balances. FCA noted that some firms lacked sufficient oversight of pricing fairness and investor value.
Firms employed digital engagement practices (DEPs), such as push notifications and gamified incentives. While all firms showed some awareness of the risks, FCA cautioned that some app designs may unintentionally drive higher trade frequency and risk exposure.
Target Market and Product Suitability Concerns
The FCA observed that several apps did not adequately define their target customer profiles. In some cases, complex or high-risk products were accessible to users without sufficient knowledge or experience. Appropriateness testing was found to be weak in certain apps, allowing unqualified investors to access unsuitable offerings.
Behavioral Research Shows Demographic Impact
FCA's behavioral study indicated that trading apps with more gamified elements attracted users with lower income and higher trade frequency. These users also tended to have worse investment outcomes, raising questions about how app design may be linked to real-world financial results.
Conclusion
The FCA has not mandated specific changes but encourages firms to examine their app designs, especially concerning user engagement features, pricing transparency, and risk control procedures. With trading apps rapidly growing in popularity, especially among younger demographics, proper oversight remains critical to ensuring responsible investment access.
Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.
Read more

Firsttrade Review: Traders Raise Ponzi-Style Scam Concerns, Withdrawal Denials & More Issues
Have you lost all your capital while trading via Firsttrade? Does the US-based forex broker disallow you from withdrawing funds? Do you have to pay massive fees when transferring funds? Does your trade get affected because of frequent malfunction in the trading app? These have been haunting many traders at Firsttrade. Consequently, many of them have raised complaints online. In this Firsttrade review, we have shared such complaints. Keep reading to know about them.

Don’t Get Scammed: A Roundup of Common Online Fraud Tactics in Forex
Forex scams are evolving faster than ever; learn the most common tactics (cloned platforms, fake investment managers, fake recovery services) and how to spot them before you deposit.

Defcofx Review: Spread Manipulation & Poor Customer Support Outrage Traders
Does the poor customer support service leave you stunned when trading via Defcofx? Do you receive blunt, negative responses from the support team on several trading queries? Does the Saint Lucia-based forex broker pile on the losses for you by manipulating forex spread charges? In this Defcofx review, we have shared some complaints made against the broker. This will further answer your question: Is Defcofx real or fake?

Ponzi Scheme Operator Sentenced to 14 Years in Western Australia
Chris Marco, a Ponzi scheme operator, was sentenced to 14 years for a $34 million investment fraud in Western Australia. Read about the case and its impact.
