JPMorgan CFO Sounds Alarm on Risky Stablecoin Yields
JPMorgan CFO warns high-return stablecoins could endanger financial stability as global regulators move toward tighter digital asset rules.
简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
Abstract:After reaching an all-time high of $261 in January, Solana (SOL) has seen its value decline, driven largely by the cooling of the meme coin frenzy that had fuelled its rapid ascent.

After reaching an all-time high of $261 in January, Solana (SOL) has seen its value decline, driven largely by the cooling of the meme coin frenzy that had fuelled its rapid ascent. Currently trading around the $168 level for the first time since November, concerns have emerged regarding the blockchain's dependence on speculative trading and whether it can maintain long-term momentum.
Solana‘s recent surge in popularity was primarily propelled by the speculative minting of meme coins, many of which lacked fundamental utility and were often linked to pump-and-dump schemes. These speculative assets attracted retail investors seeking quick gains, only to result in significant losses as the market corrected itself. As enthusiasm for these tokens diminishes, Solana’s price has followed suit, further impacted by broader weakness across the digital asset market.

Tokens such as MELANIA and LIBRA contributed to Solana‘s heightened volatility, exacerbating concerns over insider trading and market manipulation. The rapid price fluctuations triggered significant liquidations, further driving SOL’s decline. Critics have pointed out that the unregulated nature of these launches allowed early participants to offload their holdings onto retail investors at artificially inflated prices, accelerating the downturn.
Despite the challenges posed by its reliance on speculative trading, Solana continues to attract users due to its low transaction costs and high-speed processing capabilities. These features have made it a preferred network for high-frequency trading and retail speculation, contributing to robust on-chain activity. While its recent struggles highlight the risks of unchecked speculation, some analysts argue that such activity remains a fundamental aspect of the broader cryptocurrency market and is unlikely to disappear entirely.
Institutional interest in Solana remains strong despite recent setbacks. Investment firms such as VanEck and Bitwise have recently submitted proposals with the Chicago Board Options Exchange (CBOE) for Solana-based exchange-traded products (ETPs), underscoring confidence in the blockchains long-term potential.

Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.

JPMorgan CFO warns high-return stablecoins could endanger financial stability as global regulators move toward tighter digital asset rules.

UbitMarkets review reveals no valid license and direct links to a fraudulent project, raising serious concerns over investor fund safety.

Is withdrawing capital from PaxForex too difficult for traders? Has the China-based forex broker made you trade gold, silver and cryptocurrencies despite not having an office in the United States? Do you find its operational style suspicious? You are not alone! Several traders have expressed these concerns when trading with the broker. In this PaxForex review article, we have exposed the broker through user comments made on several review platforms. Take a look!

When traders ask, "Is OneRoyal legit or a scam?" The answer isn't simply yes or no. OneRoyal is a trading company that has been running for almost twenty years and has important licenses from top financial authorities. This background puts it far away from typical quick scam operations. However, questions about whether it's trustworthy are reasonable and often come from its complicated business structure, the use of overseas companies, and a pattern of specific, serious complaints from users. This article aims to go beyond marketing claims and provide a fact-based analysis of OneRoyal's trustworthiness.