UbitMarkets Review 2026: No Regulation, Direct Links to UBIT Coin Scam, and Serious Platform Risks
UbitMarkets review reveals no valid license and direct links to a fraudulent project, raising serious concerns over investor fund safety.
简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
Abstract:In a significant ruling, a court in The Hague has ordered the cryptocurrency exchange Binance to disclose personal information of an account holder implicated in a major dating app scam. This directive follows a case involving a Dutch woman who fell victim to a “pig butchering” scam, leading to a loss of nearly €186,000 (approximately $200,000 USD) in what she believed to be a legitimate cryptocurrency investment.

In a significant ruling, a court in The Hague has ordered the cryptocurrency exchange Binance to disclose personal information of an account holder implicated in a major dating app scam. This directive follows a case involving a Dutch woman who fell victim to a “pig butchering” scam, leading to a loss of nearly €186,000 (approximately $200,000 USD) in what she believed to be a legitimate cryptocurrency investment.
The case began when the woman, who met her scammer on a dating app, was gradually persuaded over time to invest substantial sums of money in a supposed cryptocurrency opportunity. Over six separate transactions, she transferred a total of €186,000, believing it would yield considerable returns. Only after realising she had been deceived did she report the crime to Dutch authorities and enlist the help of a private investigation firm to trace her funds.

Investigators successfully tracked a portion of the stolen funds to an account on Binance, one of the world‘s largest cryptocurrency exchanges. Although Binance subsequently froze the account, the exchange refused to release any information about the account holder, citing its privacy policy and the need for a court order. In response, the victim’s legal team sought judicial intervention to uncover the scammer‘s identity, arguing that justice in this case outweighed privacy considerations. The Dutch court ruled in favour of the victim, mandating that Binance disclose the scammer’s full name and address within 14 days. Furthermore, the court extended the freeze on the account for four weeks, allowing the victim time to consider additional legal actions.
This ruling highlights a growing legal expectation for cryptocurrency platforms to cooperate in fraud investigations, especially as regulatory scrutiny increases across global jurisdictions. In recent months, both the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) have intensified their efforts to combat crypto-related fraud schemes, including so-called pig butchering scams.
Pig butchering scams involve fraudsters cultivating relationships with victims, often via dating apps or social media. The scammer initially encourages small investments with promises of high returns, gradually building trust before persuading the victim to invest large amounts. Once significant funds are secured, the scammer vanishes, leaving the victim with nothing.
This case underscores the ongoing tension between privacy protection and regulatory compliance in the cryptocurrency industry. As regulatory bodies increase oversight, exchanges like Binance face mounting pressure to work alongside authorities to prevent and address fraudulent activities. Compliance with such legal directives may strengthen trust in crypto platforms but also raises complex privacy issues.
Ultimately, this Dutch court decision serves as a reminder to crypto platforms about their role in combating fraud and highlights the increasing regulatory obligations they face.

Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.

UbitMarkets review reveals no valid license and direct links to a fraudulent project, raising serious concerns over investor fund safety.

Is withdrawing capital from PaxForex too difficult for traders? Has the China-based forex broker made you trade gold, silver and cryptocurrencies despite not having an office in the United States? Do you find its operational style suspicious? You are not alone! Several traders have expressed these concerns when trading with the broker. In this PaxForex review article, we have exposed the broker through user comments made on several review platforms. Take a look!

When traders ask, "Is OneRoyal legit or a scam?" The answer isn't simply yes or no. OneRoyal is a trading company that has been running for almost twenty years and has important licenses from top financial authorities. This background puts it far away from typical quick scam operations. However, questions about whether it's trustworthy are reasonable and often come from its complicated business structure, the use of overseas companies, and a pattern of specific, serious complaints from users. This article aims to go beyond marketing claims and provide a fact-based analysis of OneRoyal's trustworthiness.

Crypto exchange Bybit will limit access for Japanese users in 2025, citing compliance with strict local regulations.