简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
CFTC Fines Nasdaq Futures $22M for Providing Misleading Info
Abstract:CFTC fines Nasdaq Futures $22M for providing misleading info and violating Core Principles. This penalty underscores the importance of transparency in financial markets.

Washington, DC - The Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) fined Nasdaq Futures, Inc. $22 million, a former designated contract market (DCM). The penalty is the result of the company's failure to disclose important data about its incentive programs to both the CFTC and the public, as well as submitting incorrect and misleading information to the regulatory body. This fine emphasizes the CFTC's strict regulation of market activities as well as the value of openness in the financial sector.
Violation of Core Principles
The CFTC's inquiry showed that Nasdaq Futures, Inc. failed to create, monitor, or enforce regulations governing an incentive program given to select traders on its platform. The Commodity Exchange Act (CEA) requires DCMs, such as Nasdaq Futures, to follow specified Core Principles aimed at maintaining market integrity and safeguarding participants. Among these principles is the duty to provide the CFTC, market participants, and the general public with accurate and full information.
Nasdaq Futures, Inc. failed in this respect by failing to disclose all aspects of its incentive scheme. In particular, the business did not notify the CFTC about a volume-based component of its “Designated Market Maker” (DMM) program. This component provides extra payouts to specific participants depending on the overall amount of contracts exchanged, a critical fact that was concealed in CFTC communications.
False and Misleading Statements
Nasdaq Futures, Inc., was a DCM that specialized in energy commodity futures contracts between July 2015 and July 2018. During this time, the business launched a number of incentive schemes, including the DMM program, which paid a set monthly stipend to market makers to boost market liquidity. However, the CFTC was purposely kept unaware of the existence of a volume-based incentive inside this scheme.

According to the CFTC's ruling, Nasdaq Futures, Inc. provided incorrect and misleading information concerning the DMM program. When questioned by CFTC officials, workers consistently denied the existence of volume-based incentives despite the fact that such payments were given to some program participants. These practices violated the CEA and undercut the CFTC's expectation of trust and openness from regulated firms.
Regulatory Oversight and Compliance Failures
The CFTC's ruling also cited Nasdaq Futures, Inc.'s failure to follow regulatory service provider guidelines. The corporation was instructed to contact three DMM program members about a particular trading activity, but it did not do so and did not record the reasons for its decision. This lapse added to the breaches of other DCM Core Principles.
CFTC Director of Enforcement Ian McGinley underscored the gravity of the infractions, adding, “The CFTC's oversight regime is dependent on CFTC-designated exchanges providing accurate information to the CFTC and market participants.” Nasdaq Futures, Inc.'s actions here constitute severe breaches of both its responsibility to furnish such information and multiple statutory Core Principles applicable to CFTC-designated exchanges.
Consequences and Industry Impact
The $22 million civil monetary penalty issued on Nasdaq Futures, Inc. exemplifies the repercussions of failing to comply with regulatory standards. The CFTC's action emphasizes the significance of openness and correct reporting in ensuring market stability.
This case is keenly watched by the financial sector, as it demonstrates the CFTC's commitment to holding corporations accountable for their activities. The penalties also send a strong message to all market players about the necessity of complying with regulatory requirements and the consequences of non-compliance.
The CFTC expressed gratitude to the National Futures Association for their help in this instance. Brett Shanks, Elsie Robinson, Jeff Le Riche, Brandon Wozniak, Margaret Aisenbrey, Jordon Grimm, Christopher Reed, Charles Marvine, and former Division of Enforcement employee Jo Mettenburg were all engaged in this case.
Conclusion
Nasdaq Futures, Inc. received a $22 million penalty for failing to disclose critical information and making deceptive representations to the CFTC. This case emphasizes the crucial necessity of regulatory compliance and openness in financial markets and confirms the CFTC's responsibility to ensure market stability.
Stay updated on this and other financial news by visiting our WikiFX news page for the latest updates and in-depth coverage.

Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.
Read more

Charles Schwab Review: Traders Claim Illegitimate Profit Cancellation, Trade Manipulation & More
Have you been lured into the Charles Schwab app for trading on the back of outrageous profit claims by the broker? Did you fail to receive any of these? Does the broker deny withdrawals every time you request and cancel your forex trading account? Have you been victimized financially by its trade manipulation? Act before you are left with a NIL balance in your account. Many traders have questioned Charles Schwab customer service and many other operational executives for the aforementioned illegitimate trading activities. In this Charles Schwab review article, we have shared some of their comments. Read on!

AMP Futures Exposed: Traders Raise Alarms Over Illegitimate Account Blocks & Bad Customer Service
Has AMP Futures blocked your forex trading account? Does it fail to provide any explanation for this act? Do you face issues concerning deposits to your AMP Futures account? Is the customer service non-existent for any trading query you raise with it? You are not alone! Many traders have been facing these issues upon AMP Futures login. Some of them have commented on AMP Futures review platforms. In this article, we have shared some reviews that you can look at. Read on!

FXGlory Review: Vanishing Profits, Capital Scams & Withdrawal Charges Keep Annoying Traders
Does FXGlory remove all your forex trading account balances upon fund withdrawal requests? Or do you witness incorrect trading account balances after fund withdrawals? Does the Saint Lucia-based forex broker charge you for fund withdrawals? All these and many more scam-related complaints have been filed against the forex broker. In this FXGlory review article, we will discuss several complaints. Read on!

PINAKINE Broker Review: A Complete Look at Its Services and Risks
Finding a trustworthy broker from the huge and often confusing world of online trading options is one of the biggest challenges a trader faces. In this competitive market, PINAKINE Liquidity Limited has appeared, getting attention with promises of high leverage and zero-commission trading. However, a closer look shows important factors that every potential client must think about before investing. The most important thing to consider with PINAKINE is that it has no regulation. This fact completely changes how risky the broker is and has major effects on how safe your investments will be. This review gives a complete and fair examination based on information available to the public. We will break down its services, trading conditions, platform technology, and the possible risks involved, helping you make a fully informed decision.

