简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
Top Financial Firms Face Massive Fines by SEC
Abstract:The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) recently announced a significant enforcement action against 26 financial firms, including broker-dealers and registered investment advisers. These firms have agreed to collectively pay $392.75 million in civil penalties due to their failure to maintain records of off-channel communications.

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) recently announced a significant enforcement action against 26 financial firms, including broker-dealers and registered investment advisers. These firms have agreed to collectively pay $392.75 million in civil penalties due to their failure to maintain records of off-channel communications.
One of the firms hit with the largest penalties, Ameriprise Financial Services, was fined $50 million. Edward D. Jones & Co. and LPL Financial faced identical fines of $50 million each. Raymond James & Associates, another major player in the financial sector, was also fined $50 million. RBC Capital Markets incurred a slightly lower penalty of $45 million, while BNY Mellon Securities Corporation and Pershing together were fined $40 million. TD Securities (USA), TD Private Client Wealth, and Epoch Investment Partners faced a combined fine of $30 million. Osaic Wealth, a smaller firm in comparison, was penalized with an $18 million fine.

Each firm was charged with violating specific recordkeeping requirements outlined in the Securities Exchange Act and the Investment Advisers Act, or both. The SEC also accused these companies of insufficient supervision of their staff, which failed to prevent and detect these recordkeeping violations. As a result, the SEC censured the firms and ordered them to cease and desist from further breaches of these critical rules.
Additional penalties totalling $34.15 million were imposed on other firms, including Apex Clearing Corporation, Cowen and Company, First Trust Portfolios, and Haitong International Securities (USA). These penalties underscore the SECs commitment to ensuring adherence to regulatory requirements across all levels of the financial sector.
In a notable development, three firms—Cetera Advisor Networks, Hilltop Securities, and Truist Securities—self-reported their violations. This proactive step resulted in reduced penalties for these companies, highlighting the SEC's willingness to consider the cooperation and transparency of firms when determining fines.
The enforcement action included prominent firms such as Ameriprise Financial Services, BNY Mellon Securities Corporation, Edward D. Jones & Co., LPL Financial, and RBC Capital Markets. These firms admitted to violating federal securities laws related to recordkeeping and have started implementing measures to rectify these issues.
In a related development, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission reached settlements with The Toronto Dominion Bank, Cowen and Company, and Truist Bank over similar issues. Earlier in February, the SEC had already ordered 16 firms to pay a combined total of $81 million for charges related to off-channel communications. Just last week, Raymond James agreed to a $50 million settlement with the SEC, and in May, LPL Financial also agreed to a $50 million settlement for related allegations.
The SEC emphasized its dedication to enforcing the books and records requirements of the federal securities laws, as stated by Gurbir Grewal, director of the SECs Division of Enforcement. Grewal highlighted the importance of these requirements in protecting investors and ensuring well-functioning markets.

Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.
Read more

JP Markets Review: High Spread & Commission, Fake Bonus Lure & Withdrawal Hassles Frustrate Traders
Have you been lured into opening a JP Markets Forex Trading Account with a high bonus offer that never existed? Have you found the spread and commission charges higher on JP Markets Login than what’s advertised on the broker’s website? Wondering why you are not able to withdraw funds from your trading account? Well, all of these hint at a potential forex investment scam. Many traders have expressed their disappointment while sharing the JP Markets Review online. In this article, we have shared certain complaints. Take a look at them.

Angel one 2025 Review & Complaints
Angel One is a well-known name in the forex market. People are familiar with the name , but is this broker really worth your interest? What do real users say about Angel One, and what complaints have they shared? In this Angel One 2025 review, you will explore all these details.

Exclusive Markets Under the Scanner: Traders Report High Swap Charges, Deposit Discrepancies & More
Is your forex trading account experience at Exclusive Markets far from good? Do you witness high swap fees and daily charges? Does the deposit fail to reflect in your Exclusive Markets Login? Don’t receive adequate response from the customer support official on your trading queries? You are not alone! Traders have already alleged that the forex broker is involved in these activities. In this Exclusive Markets WikiFX review article, we shared some traders’ comments. Read on to know about them.

Interactive Brokers Fined for FINRA Market Data Lapses
Interactive Brokers fined $150,000 by FINRA over Vendor Display Rule violations and supervisory gaps; firm adds real-time consolidated data displays.
