Doo Group Rebrands UK and South Africa Units to RKX
Doo Group rebrands its UK and South Africa entities to RKX, reflecting regulatory updates and broader strategic changes.
简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
Abstract:Interactive Brokers reports a $48M loss due to NYSE's rejection of error petitions after Berkshire Hathaway's stock price plummeted. Recovery options are being considered.

On June 3, 2024, Interactive Brokers (NASDAQ: IBKR) reported a substantial financial effect as the price of Berkshire Hathaway Class A shares dropped precipitously. The business reported that it suffered around $48 million in damages as a result of a technical failure at the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE), which caused the stock price to plummet from around $622,000 to an amazing $185 per share.
The event occurred about 9:50 a.m. EDT when the price of Berkshire Hathaway's Class A stock fell in seconds. This precipitous decline, which was ascribed to an undisclosed technical fault at the NYSE, resulted in an immediate suspension of stock trading. Following the suspension, customers of Interactive Brokers' numerous subsidiaries spotted a brief opportunity and submitted market purchase orders at significantly discounted prices, expecting a huge deal once trading restarted.
However, the NYSE restarted trading without correcting the significant order imbalance that had developed during the pause. When trading resumed at around 11:35:54 a.m. EDT, the share price skyrocketed to $648,000, then to $741,971.39 within 98 seconds. This quick growth led to multiple Interactive Brokers customers' orders being completed at these exceptionally high prices, with some transactions reaching the top price.

Recognizing the chaotic nature of these deals, Interactive Brokers quickly filed an erroneous execution (CEE) petition with the NYSE and other US exchanges, attempting to cancel the transactions completed at these aberrant prices. Unfortunately, the NYSE took several hours to react, and the business learned that their petition had been denied after normal trading hours had ended.
That evening, Interactive Brokers decided to take up a significant chunk of these deals to better serve its clients. The business also filed compensation claims with the NYSE, but these were refused on June 25, 2024. This rejection verified the company's realization of nearly $48 million in damages, which included losses on some hedging agreements.
Despite the major financial setback, Interactive Brokers has claimed that the losses are unlikely to have a meaningful impact on its financial situation. The business is currently investigating possibilities for recovering these funds, which may include initiating legal action against NYSE or associated organizations.
The fast and upfront notification by Interactive Brokers about the issue shows the intricacies and hazards involved in electronic trading, as well as the possible consequences of technological breakdowns at large exchanges. The company's proactive approach to handling the repercussions and pursuing reparation demonstrates its dedication to its customers and financial stability.
As Interactive Brokers considers its next actions, the rest of the market keeps a careful eye on the situation.

Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.

Doo Group rebrands its UK and South Africa entities to RKX, reflecting regulatory updates and broader strategic changes.

As global markets enter 2026 amid shifting interest-rate cycles, AI-driven trading tools, and rising retail participation, choosing the right forex broker has become more critical than ever. While no broker can guarantee profits, some platforms offer better trading conditions, stronger regulation, and lower execution costs, which significantly improve a trader’s long-term profitability potential.

Before trusting any broker, you need to check if it is properly regulated. The safety of your capital and fair trading conditions depend completely on how well the broker is supervised. For a thorough check on brokers like BlackBull Markets, websites like WikiFX can give you collected information, license tracking and user reviews, providing an important independent check. This article aims to answer a key question: Is BlackBull Markets a safe and regulated broker? The simple answer is yes, but the regulation setup uses two different licenses that every trader needs to understand. We will break down the BlackBull Markets regulation system, explain each BlackBull Markets license, and make clear what this setup means for you as a trader. Our review is based on facts you can check and aims to give you an unbiased, expert view.

When traders ask, "Is BlackBull Markets safe or a scam?", they want a simple answer to a hard question. The facts show two different sides. The broker began operating in 2014 and has a strong license from New Zealand's Financial Markets Authority (FMA). It also has an "Excellent" rating on review sites such as Trustpilot. But when searching for "BlackBull Markets complaints," you find many negative user stories, including withdrawal issues and poor trading conditions. This article goes beyond simple "safe" or "scam" labels. We want to carefully look at both the good reviews and common problems, comparing them with how the broker actually works and its licenses. This fact-based approach will give you the full picture of its user reputation, helping you make your own smart decision.