简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
Unveiling Fraud: FPFX vs. Funded Engineer Legal Battle
Abstract:Amidst an ongoing legal battle, Tristian Talbot and Harri Jean David Sawicki, reportedly overseeing Funded Engineer and its crucial website, face dispute resolution in Palm Beach County, Florida, over alleged contractual breaches following an FPFX audit revealing manipulative practices, triggering significant revenue losses and terminated agreements.

Tristian Talbot, based in Thailand, and Harri Jean David Sawicki, residing in Vietnam, allegedly oversee Funded Engineer and its website, which are at the heart of an ongoing legal dispute. The legal proceedings are set to take place in Palm Beach County, Florida, in accordance with the original agreement's dispute resolution clause.
FPFX‘s complaint outlines that under a software services agreement dated June 2, 2023, the defendants were granted rights to utilize FPFX’s software, with obligations to pay monthly fees and other specified amounts. However, an FPFX audit conducted in January 2024 revealed alleged record manipulation by the defendants, aimed at reducing payments owed under the agreement. This included the creation of fabricated trading accounts and participation in “wash trading,” practices resulting in an estimated revenue loss of $700,000 for FPFX.
In response to what FPFX labels as “nefarious, illegal, and unethical activities,” the vendor terminated the agreement on February 7, 2024. In March, FPFX initiated a demand for mediation in accordance with the contracts terms to resolve the dispute.

The investigation identified various fraudulent actions conducted by Funded Engineer, including the creation of fictitious trading accounts, bypassing Anti-Money Laundering (AML) and Know Your Customer (KYC) protocols, engaging in wash trading, and fabricating payouts. These activities aimed to overstate the firms payment activities, thus misleading traders and FPFX Tech.
Specific findings from the audit revealed that Funded Engineer manually created seemingly fake user profiles in their administrative portal. These profiles, lacking any payment history or billing details, were directly provided with funded accounts, circumventing the firms usual requirement for traders to complete a challenge before obtaining such accounts.
Further infractions included manually overriding AML/KYC checks, allowing individuals to be approved for funded accounts without standard due diligence. Additionally, Funded Engineer‘s personnel engaged in wash trading, solely to inflate the firm’s pay-out statistics.
The audit also revealed that despite approving pay-outs in the system, Funded Engineer did not disburse any funds to these fictitious accounts. Instead, the prop firm purportedly pretended to make payments through cryptocurrency wallets and global payroll services without corresponding blockchain transactions.
FPFX Techs probe concluded that Funded Engineer had overstated its pay-outs by more than $2 million, a fact promoted by one of its founders, Tristian Talbot, on social media.
Following FPFXs decision to terminate its licensing agreement, Funded Engineer issued a series of updates addressing the situation.
The firm expressed disappointment over the abrupt termination and the subsequent negative public relations campaign launched by FPFX Tech, noting that this occurred without warning or an opportunity for dialogue.
Funded Engineer expressed surprise and concern over how their services were terminated and how they were removed from all past communications by FPFX Tech. The firm criticized the lack of communication prior to the action and the negative PR campaign that ensued, adding that they were not approached for comment on the allegations.
Regarding the allegations, Funded Engineer stated that the matter has become a legal case, limiting their ability to share further details publicly. However, the firm assured its community that it is treating the situation with the utmost seriousness.

Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.
Read more

WikiEXPO Dubai 2025 Concludes Successfully — Convening Global Financial Leaders to Shape a Transpare
On November 11, WikiEXPO Dubai 2025, hosted by WikiGlobal and co-organized by WikiFX, successfully concluded. As one of the world’s most influential Fintech expos, this event brought together more than 570 regulatory representatives, industry leaders, and innovation pioneers from across the globe. Through in-depth discussions on core issues such as regulatory compliance, the forex market, investment strategies, and sustainable finance, the event delivered a profound experience that masterfully blended intellectual depth with actionable insights.

The 5%ers Review: Is it a Scam or Legit? Find Out from These Trader Comments
Did you face reduced leverage and hiked fees without any explanation from The 5%ers broker? Do you find The 5%er rules strange for getting a funded account from this prop trading firm? Has the broker closed your trade inappropriately, preventing you from making gains in the forex market? All these allegations have dominated The 5%ers review segment online. Looking at this, the WikiFX team investigated and found some startling comments against the broker. In this article, we have shared those complaints. Read on!

BROKSTOCK Exposed: Traders Report Login Errors, Withdrawal Issues & Incompetent Customer Support
Is your BROKSTOCK trading account full of inefficiencies? Do the recurrent BROKSTOCK login errors prevent you from opening and shorting positions at a favorable price? Has the broker failed to honor your withdrawal requests? Do you face order execution price issues? Has the customer support service failed to resolve your queries? You are not alone! In this BROKSTOCK review article, we have shared some complaints that need a close introspection. Read on to explore them.

OmegaPro Review: Traders Flood Comment Sections with Withdrawal Denials & Scam Complaints
Has your deposit and withdrawal scenario worsened after the initial good experience at OmegaPro, a UK-based forex broker? Does the broker ask you to invest when withdrawing your funds? Did the broker officials trap you with their false promises of compound interest on your deposit? Have you found it impossible to transfer funds from your OmegaPro login to another broker’s account? Do you witness a lack of support when dealing with these unfortunate trading circumstances? These are no longer isolated complaints — they have allegedly become the reason for OmegaPro’s tarnished trust and reputation within the trading community. Read on as we share the OmegaPro review in this article.
