简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
Australia's $41 Million Crypto Scheme Meltdown
Abstract:The collapse of a major cryptocurrency investment program in Australia, affecting over 450 investors and involving approximately US$41 million, has led to swift regulatory action by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC), including the filing of a lawsuit against three crypto mining companies and their directors.

The collapse of a significant cryptocurrency investment program in Australia has sent shockwaves through the financial landscape, involving approximately US$41 million and impacting over 450 investors. This development prompted the country's financial regulatory body, the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC), to take swift action by filing a lawsuit against three crypto mining companies collectively known as NGS Companies, along with their sole directors.
In response to ASIC's legal action, a court order was obtained to seize digital assets held by NGS Companies. Furthermore, one of the directors has been prohibited from leaving the country, indicating the severity of the situation and the regulatory scrutiny it has attracted.
NGS Companies had enticed investors with investment plans centred around their cryptocurrency mining activities. The allure of guaranteed yearly returns, advertised on their website to be as high as 16%, with a minimum of 6%, attracted a significant number of investors seeking profitable opportunities in the crypto space.

The collapse of this cryptocurrency investment scheme has raised concerns within the regulatory sphere, particularly regarding the potential loss of invested funds. Of notable concern is the revelation that none of the three companies possessed the necessary licenses to operate legally within Australia. ASIC has taken a firm stance, holding NGS Companies accountable for unlawfully marketing crypto mining investment products and exposing investors to financial risk.
Joe Longo, the head of ASIC, issued a cautionary statement to Australians managing their retirement savings, urging them to exercise caution when considering investments in crypto-related products. Longo emphasized the importance of thoroughly assessing risks before committing funds, especially when utilizing self-managed superannuation funds for such investments.
Furthermore, Longo underscored that this case serves as a stark warning to the broader crypto industry. ASIC remains committed to vigilantly monitoring products and enforcing regulatory compliance to safeguard consumers and uphold market integrity.
This recent incident follows a pattern of similar actions taken by ASIC earlier this year. The regulator's proactive approach has seen the dismantling of other high-profit cryptocurrency schemes and the penalization of individuals involved in dishonest practices within the crypto fund sector.

Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.
Read more

The 5%ers Review: Is it a Scam or Legit? Find Out from These Trader Comments
Did you face reduced leverage and hiked fees without any explanation from The 5%ers broker? Do you find The 5%er rules strange for getting a funded account from this prop trading firm? Has the broker closed your trade inappropriately, preventing you from making gains in the forex market? All these allegations have dominated The 5%ers review segment online. Looking at this, the WikiFX team investigated and found some startling comments against the broker. In this article, we have shared those complaints. Read on!

BROKSTOCK Exposed: Traders Report Login Errors, Withdrawal Issues & Incompetent Customer Support
Is your BROKSTOCK trading account full of inefficiencies? Do the recurrent BROKSTOCK login errors prevent you from opening and shorting positions at a favorable price? Has the broker failed to honor your withdrawal requests? Do you face order execution price issues? Has the customer support service failed to resolve your queries? You are not alone! In this BROKSTOCK review article, we have shared some complaints that need a close introspection. Read on to explore them.

OmegaPro Review: Traders Flood Comment Sections with Withdrawal Denials & Scam Complaints
Has your deposit and withdrawal scenario worsened after the initial good experience at OmegaPro, a UK-based forex broker? Does the broker ask you to invest when withdrawing your funds? Did the broker officials trap you with their false promises of compound interest on your deposit? Have you found it impossible to transfer funds from your OmegaPro login to another broker’s account? Do you witness a lack of support when dealing with these unfortunate trading circumstances? These are no longer isolated complaints — they have allegedly become the reason for OmegaPro’s tarnished trust and reputation within the trading community. Read on as we share the OmegaPro review in this article.

Inzo Broker Review 2025: A Complete Look at Features, Costs and User Claims
Inzo Broker presents itself as a modern forex and CFD broker, started in 2021 and registered in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines. At first glance, it offers an attractive package for traders: access to the popular MetaTrader 5 (MT5) and cTrader platforms, different types of accounts for various budget levels, and a wide selection of assets to trade. These features are made to attract both new and experienced traders. However, a closer look shows a big difference between these advertised benefits and the real risks. The broker works under an offshore regulatory system, which gives limited protection to investors. More importantly, Inzo has collected many serious user complaints, especially about withdrawing funds and changing trading conditions unfairly. This mix of weak oversight and serious user claims creates a high-risk situation that potential clients must carefully think about. This review will break down these parts to give a clear, fact-based view.
