简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
G.H. Financials Hit with $150k Penalty for Violating CME Rules
Abstract:CME Group imposes a $150,000 fine on G.H. Financials for rule violations related to the prompt provision of crucial identity information, hindering effective market surveillance.

CME Group, a prominent international derivatives marketplace, has taken decisive disciplinary action against G.H. Financials, LLC, as indicated by the issuance of a formal notice. This action stems from a thorough investigation and subsequent findings by the Chicago Mercantile Exchange (CME) Business Conduct Committee. The matter revolves around alleged rule violations by G.H. Financials, which were neither admitted nor denied by the company as part of a settlement offer.
The investigation revealed that, spanning from March 2019 to March 2021, G.H. Financials, operating as a clearing member firm, maintained a customer omnibus account designed to cater to the customers of a foreign Introducing Broker. Within this timeframe, G.H. Financials faced persistent issues related to the prompt provision of the identities of individuals or teams assigned to operator IDs within the specified omnibus account. Specifically, when requested by Market Regulation, G.H. Financials failed to promptly deliver this crucial information.

The repercussions of this failure were significant, as it impeded the ability of Market Regulation to effectively monitor the messaging and trading activities of the Introducing Broker's customers. The affected markets included a spectrum of currency futures markets such as the Australian Dollar, British Pound, Canadian Dollar, Swiss Franc, Mexican Peso, New Zealand Dollar, Japanese Yen, Euro FX, and E-mini S&P 500.
In light of these findings, the Panel of the CME Business Conduct Committee unequivocally concluded that G.H. Financials had violated key CME Rules, specifically Rules 432.Q. and 576. Rule 432.Q. pertains to the provision of information, stating that prompt and accurate responses to inquiries from CME Group staff are imperative, while Rule 576 deals with the cooperation principle, emphasizing the obligation to cooperate with any investigation undertaken by CME Group.
As part of the settlement offer, the Panel has imposed a financial penalty on G.H. Financials. The company is obligated to pay a fine amounting to $150,000. This monetary penalty reflects the seriousness of the rule violations and serves as a deterrent to ensure adherence to the regulatory framework set forth by CME Group.
Disciplinary actions of this nature underscore the commitment of derivative marketplaces like CME Group to maintaining the integrity and transparency of financial markets. The penalties imposed are not merely punitive but are intended to reinforce compliance, fostering an environment where market participants adhere to the highest standards of conduct. The case of G.H. Financials serves as a reminder to all entities operating within the derivatives market of the paramount importance of timely and accurate disclosure in order to facilitate effective market surveillance and uphold the principles of fair and orderly trading.

Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.
Read more

WikiEXPO Dubai 2025 “Welcome Party” Kicks Off Tonight!
In anticipation of the upcoming WikiEXPO Dubai 2025, the WikiEXPO Organizing Committee has specially arranged a high-end social gathering—the “Welcome Party”. The event will be grandly held on the evening of Monday, Nov 10, on the 6th Floor, Conrad Dubai, UAE.

Capital.com Review 2025: Is It a Scam? Official License Verification and Real User Ratings
Is Capital.com truly safe in 2025? Explore its global licenses, on-site verifications, user complaints, pros & cons, and key risks in one objective review.

Charles Schwab Review: Traders Claim Illegitimate Profit Cancellation, Trade Manipulation & More
Have you been lured into the Charles Schwab app for trading on the back of outrageous profit claims by the broker? Did you fail to receive any of these? Does the broker deny withdrawals every time you request and cancel your forex trading account? Have you been victimized financially by its trade manipulation? Act before you are left with a NIL balance in your account. Many traders have questioned Charles Schwab customer service and many other operational executives for the aforementioned illegitimate trading activities. In this Charles Schwab review article, we have shared some of their comments. Read on!

AMP Futures Exposed: Traders Raise Alarms Over Illegitimate Account Blocks & Bad Customer Service
Has AMP Futures blocked your forex trading account? Does it fail to provide any explanation for this act? Do you face issues concerning deposits to your AMP Futures account? Is the customer service non-existent for any trading query you raise with it? You are not alone! Many traders have been facing these issues upon AMP Futures login. Some of them have commented on AMP Futures review platforms. In this article, we have shared some reviews that you can look at. Read on!
