简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
ThinkMarkets to Transfer $4.28M as Client Refunds
Abstract:London/Australia-based broker ThinkMarkets faces a court order to transfer $4.28 million into its UK client account following a legal dispute with a Turkish client, Abdurrahman Suzgun, accused of "swap abuse" and amidst the broker's recent financial challenges and cancelled merger plans.

ThinkMarkets, a Retail FX and CFDs broker headquartered in London and Australia, has been served with a court order from the Business and Property Courts of England and Wales – London Circuit Commercial Court. This court order, amounting to USD $4.28 million, is directed at both of ThinkMarkets operational entities, namely TF Global Markets (UK) Ltd and TF Global Markets (Aust) Pty Ltd. The interim mandatory injunction stipulates that ThinkMarkets must transfer the specified amount, $4,280,818.88, into its client money segregated account in the UK by 4:30 pm on Monday, January 15.
The issuance of this court order follows a legal dispute involving ThinkMarkets and a former client, Abdurrahman Suzgun, from Turkey. In late 2021, ThinkMarkets had communicated to Mr. Suzgun about the debiting of USD $4.28 million from his account, prompting the legal action taken by the aggrieved party against the broker.
Presiding over the matter, His Honour Judge Richard Pearce's order explicitly warns that failure to comply may lead to contempt of court, with potential consequences such as imprisonment, fines, or asset seizure for ThinkMarkets, its directors, or officers.

To provide context to the dispute, Abdurrahman Suzgun, a trader based in Turkey specializing in forex and precious metals, initiated a business relationship with ThinkMarkets UK in 2019. Ostensibly, the purpose was to hedge positions in his physical precious metals business. ThinkMarkets facilitated two accounts for Mr. Suzgun—a standard trading account and a Swap-Free Account, commonly offered by FX/CFD brokers for clients adhering to Islamic law, which prohibits interest charges.
In mid-2021, ThinkMarkets accused Mr. Suzgun of breaching the agreement by engaging in “swap abuse.” The broker contended that the Swap-Free Account was intended for exceptional circumstances and short-term positions, not for over 90% of trades carried for more than a day, as alleged by ThinkMarkets. The broker asserted potential earnings of over USD $1.6 million in Swap Charges if these trades had occurred in the regular account. Subsequently, ThinkMarkets debited $4.28 million labelled as “disputed funds” and an additional $370,000 classified as “undisputed funds” from Mr. Suzgun's account. The funds were transferred to ThinkMarkets Australia, the liquidity provider to ThinkMarkets UK.
Mr. Suzgun vehemently refuted ThinkMarkets' allegations, insisting that all trades adhered to the agreement's terms. Additionally, he claimed that, post-dispute, ThinkMarkets transferred his accounts to its Bermudan entity to evade FCA jurisdiction, despite his objections.
Although the UK courts are scheduled to hear the matter in February, the recent court order mandates ThinkMarkets to return the entire sum of “disputed funds” to its client money segregated account in the UK. This development follows ThinkMarkets' recent attempts to go public through a merger with FG Acquisition Corp. on the Toronto Stock Exchange. The deal, initially valued at approximately USD $160 million, was cancelled in December after FG's public shareholders opted for refunds, revealing ThinkMarkets' financial challenges and prompting auditors to issue a “going concern” warning.

Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.
Read more

Charles Schwab Review: Traders Claim Illegitimate Profit Cancellation, Trade Manipulation & More
Have you been lured into the Charles Schwab app for trading on the back of outrageous profit claims by the broker? Did you fail to receive any of these? Does the broker deny withdrawals every time you request and cancel your forex trading account? Have you been victimized financially by its trade manipulation? Act before you are left with a NIL balance in your account. Many traders have questioned Charles Schwab customer service and many other operational executives for the aforementioned illegitimate trading activities. In this Charles Schwab review article, we have shared some of their comments. Read on!

AMP Futures Exposed: Traders Raise Alarms Over Illegitimate Account Blocks & Bad Customer Service
Has AMP Futures blocked your forex trading account? Does it fail to provide any explanation for this act? Do you face issues concerning deposits to your AMP Futures account? Is the customer service non-existent for any trading query you raise with it? You are not alone! Many traders have been facing these issues upon AMP Futures login. Some of them have commented on AMP Futures review platforms. In this article, we have shared some reviews that you can look at. Read on!

FXGlory Review: Vanishing Profits, Capital Scams & Withdrawal Charges Keep Annoying Traders
Does FXGlory remove all your forex trading account balances upon fund withdrawal requests? Or do you witness incorrect trading account balances after fund withdrawals? Does the Saint Lucia-based forex broker charge you for fund withdrawals? All these and many more scam-related complaints have been filed against the forex broker. In this FXGlory review article, we will discuss several complaints. Read on!

PINAKINE Broker Review: A Complete Look at Its Services and Risks
Finding a trustworthy broker from the huge and often confusing world of online trading options is one of the biggest challenges a trader faces. In this competitive market, PINAKINE Liquidity Limited has appeared, getting attention with promises of high leverage and zero-commission trading. However, a closer look shows important factors that every potential client must think about before investing. The most important thing to consider with PINAKINE is that it has no regulation. This fact completely changes how risky the broker is and has major effects on how safe your investments will be. This review gives a complete and fair examination based on information available to the public. We will break down its services, trading conditions, platform technology, and the possible risks involved, helping you make a fully informed decision.

