简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
SEC Fines JP Morgan $18 Million
Abstract:JP Morgan hit with $18M fine for SEC whistleblower rule violation. Learn about the case and its implications. Stay informed with our updates.

J.P. Morgan Securities LLC (JPMS) has found itself in hot water with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and has agreed to pay a substantial $18 million penalty to resolve allegations of wrongdoing. The SEC has accused JPMS of obstructing its clients from reporting potential violations of securities laws to the regulatory body, a clear violation of whistleblower protection rules.
Here's the crux of the matter: From March 2020 to July 2023, JPMS repeatedly requested its retail clients to sign confidential release agreements, but only if they had received credits or settlements from the company exceeding $1,000. These confidential agreements mandated that clients keep any information related to the settlement and underlying facts confidential. More importantly, these agreements prohibited clients from voluntarily reaching out to the SEC, even though they were allowed to respond to SEC inquiries.
The SEC has come down hard on JPMS for this practice. According to Gurbir S. Grewal, Director of the SEC's Division of Enforcement, “Whether it's in your employment contracts, settlement agreements, or elsewhere, you simply cannot include provisions that prevent individuals from contacting the SEC with evidence of wrongdoing.” Essentially, JPMS put its clients in a difficult situation by making them choose between receiving settlements or credits from the firm and reporting possible securities law violations to the SEC. This either-or scenario not only compromised critical investor protections but was also found to be illegal.

Corey Schuster, Co-Chief of the Enforcement Division's Asset Management Unit, emphasized that “Investors, whether retail or otherwise, must be free to report complaints to the SEC without any interference.” Anyone drafting or using confidentiality agreements needs to ensure they do not include provisions that obstruct potential whistleblowers.
JPMS has been found in violation of Rule 21F-17(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, a whistleblower protection rule explicitly prohibiting actions that hinder individuals from communicating directly with the SEC staff regarding possible securities law violations. While JPMS did not admit wrongdoing, it agreed to a series of measures. These include accepting censure, committing to cease from violating the whistleblower protection rule in the future, and paying the $18 million civil penalty.
The SEC's investigation into JPMS's practices was conducted by Marie DeBonis and Jessica Neiterman, with the assistance of John Farinacci, and it was overseen by Virginia Rosado Desilets, Brianna Ripa, Mr. Schuster, and Andrew Dean, all members of the SEC's Asset Management Unit. Rua Kelly of the Trial Unit also provided support during the investigation.
In conclusion, JPMS's $18 million penalty underscores the importance of adhering to whistleblower protection rules and ensuring that individuals, regardless of their position, can freely report concerns to the SEC. This case serves as a stark reminder that the integrity of our financial system relies on transparency and accountability, and actions that obstruct these principles will not be tolerated.
Explore J.P. Morgan's profile on WikiFX for in-depth information: Visit their WikiFX page here: https://www.wikifx.com/en/dealer/8981623292.html

Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.
Read more

JP Markets Review: High Spread & Commission, Fake Bonus Lure & Withdrawal Hassles Frustrate Traders
Have you been lured into opening a JP Markets Forex Trading Account with a high bonus offer that never existed? Have you found the spread and commission charges higher on JP Markets Login than what’s advertised on the broker’s website? Wondering why you are not able to withdraw funds from your trading account? Well, all of these hint at a potential forex investment scam. Many traders have expressed their disappointment while sharing the JP Markets Review online. In this article, we have shared certain complaints. Take a look at them.

Angel one 2025 Review & Complaints
Angel One is a well-known name in the forex market. People are familiar with the name , but is this broker really worth your interest? What do real users say about Angel One, and what complaints have they shared? In this Angel One 2025 review, you will explore all these details.

Exclusive Markets Under the Scanner: Traders Report High Swap Charges, Deposit Discrepancies & More
Is your forex trading account experience at Exclusive Markets far from good? Do you witness high swap fees and daily charges? Does the deposit fail to reflect in your Exclusive Markets Login? Don’t receive adequate response from the customer support official on your trading queries? You are not alone! Traders have already alleged that the forex broker is involved in these activities. In this Exclusive Markets WikiFX review article, we shared some traders’ comments. Read on to know about them.

Interactive Brokers Fined for FINRA Market Data Lapses
Interactive Brokers fined $150,000 by FINRA over Vendor Display Rule violations and supervisory gaps; firm adds real-time consolidated data displays.
WikiFX Broker
AVATRADE
IC Markets Global
FOREX.com
InteractiveBrokers
Vantage
Ultima
AVATRADE
IC Markets Global
FOREX.com
InteractiveBrokers
Vantage
Ultima
WikiFX Broker
AVATRADE
IC Markets Global
FOREX.com
InteractiveBrokers
Vantage
Ultima
AVATRADE
IC Markets Global
FOREX.com
InteractiveBrokers
Vantage
Ultima
