简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
Five Brokers Linked to $525M Fraud Scheme Are Under SEC's Radar
Abstract:The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has filed charges against nine entities, including five individuals, for an alleged multimillion-dollar fraud scheme linked to pre-IPO investments, drawing in over 4,000 global investors.

The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has brought charges against five individuals and four entities allegedly involved in a substantial fraud scheme related to pre-initial public offering (IPO) investments. Among the accused are Raymond J. Pirrello, Jr., Marcello Follano, Robert Cassino, Anthony DiTucci, Joseph Rivera, and their respective companies. These defendants are believed to have engaged in deceptive practices that led to over $525 million in unregistered offerings.
These investments drew in more than 4,000 individuals globally, enticing them with promises of no upfront fees while covertly imposing undisclosed markups. This scheme resulted in illicit profits exceeding $88 million for the defendants and their associates.
As per the complaint, Sheldon Pollock, serving as the Associate Regional Director in the New York Regional Office, highlighted that the defendants allegedly marketed unregistered securities to investors, claiming no upfront fees while purportedly channelling tens of millions through undisclosed fees for their own gain.
The accused allegedly established an extensive network of unregistered sales agents who misled investors by falsely asserting the absence of upfront fees. In reality, investors faced substantial undisclosed markups, reaching as high as 150 percent, benefiting the defendants and their sales agents.
The individuals accused supposedly concealed Raymond J. Pirrello Jr.'s involvement, concealing his past SEC sanctions related to insider trading. The SEC's complaint, filed in the US District Court for the Eastern District of New York, levied multiple violations of antifraud, securities, and broker-dealer registration laws against the defendants. The SEC seeks a permanent injunction, restitution of ill-gotten gains, and civil penalties.

In recent times, the SEC has intensified its pursuit of companies failing to register with the agency. In the previous month, the regulator initiated legal action against Kraken, a San Francisco-based crypto exchange, for allegedly operating unregistered services, encompassing securities exchange, broker, dealer, and clearing agency activities.
The charges involve claims of commingling customers funds and crypto assets with Kraken's own, echoing accusations against Binance and Coinbase. The SEC alleges Kraken operated as an exchange, broker, dealer, and clearing agency without the necessary registrations.
Kraken responded by denying accusations of fraud or market manipulation, asserting that none of the alleged funds were missing or misused. However, while Kraken did not dispute the allegation of commingling funds, it clarified that the SEC did not claim any missing or misused customer funds.

Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.
Read more

Axi Plaza Redefines Cam Ranh’s Beachfront Business Scene
Axi Plaza launches on Cam Ranh’s coast, merging resort, retail, and MICE spaces in one destination, shaping Vietnam’s tourism future.

Is Inzo Broker Safe or a Scam? An Evidence-Based Analysis for Traders
When traders check out a new broker, the main question is always about safety and whether it's real. Is Inzo a trustworthy partner for your trading capital, or is it a scam you should stay away from? The broker looks modern and professional, offering popular platforms and many different account types. However, this polished look is clouded by many serious complaints from users who report big problems with their money and trading conditions. A simple "yes" or "no" answer isn't enough. To reach a good conclusion, we need a detailed investigation based on facts. This analysis will give you a clear and fair breakdown of the facts. We will cut through the mixed information to give you a complete picture of Inzo.

Exness Restricted Countries List 2025 Explained
Exness confirms its restricted countries list for 2025. Learn where Exness is legal, supported regions, and compliance rules for global traders.

Is Uniglobe Markets Legit? A 2025 Simple Guide to Its Safety, Services, and User Warnings
When traders ask, "Is uniglobe markets legit?" They want a clear answer about whether their capital will be safe. This simple guide for 2025 will give you that answer by examining the broker from every important angle. The most important thing we found is that Uniglobe Markets works without proper financial rules and oversight, causing serious risks. This review will carefully examine its legal status, look at confusing company information, explain its trading conditions, and share real user problems. When checking any broker, it's smart to use websites with detailed verification. Traders can find complete profiles and current warnings for thousands of brokers on WikiFX to help with their research. This article will show you the facts, so you can decide smartly based on evidence, not advertising promises.

