简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
FINRA Slaps $24M Fine on BofA Securities
Abstract:FINRA levies $24 million fine against BofA Securities for alleged spoofing and supervisory failures, unveiling ongoing regulatory scrutiny across financial markets.

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) has taken action against BofA Securities, imposing a significant fine of $24 million. This penalty comes as a result of the firm's alleged involvement in more than 700 instances of spoofing and associated supervisory shortcomings within the US Treasury secondary markets, spanning over a six-year period.
Spoofing, a practice involving deceptive orders to fabricate market activity, was reportedly employed by BofA Securities through two former traders in the US Treasury secondary markets from October 2014 to February 2021. The firm stands accused of engaging in 717 instances of spoofing during this time.
The Executive Vice President and Head of Enforcement at FINRA, Bill St. Louis, expressed concern, highlighting that spoofing undermines market transparency and integrity by distorting actual supply and demand. He emphasized that this action underscores FINRA's commitment to vigorously pursue firms involved in spoofing, including cross-product spoofing.
Throughout this duration, BofA Securities failed to establish and sustain a supervisory system capable of detecting spoofing activities in the US Treasury markets. Although a system was implemented by the company in November 2015, it remained inadequate until mid-2019, primarily detecting algorithmic spoofing and not manual manipulation by traders.

While BofA Securities has accepted FINRA's findings without admitting or denying the charges, it's worth noting that the company was previously fined $325,000 last year by FINRA for allegedly issuing inaccurate monthly reports for order execution.
The regulatory body disclosed that between January 2014 and February 2022, BofA Securities incorrectly reported order execution statistics for its two market centres, MLCO and MLIX. The company reportedly disregarded the requirement to present separate statistical information under Rule 605, leading to combined reports for both centres being published.
In a separate incident, Credit Suisse faced scrutiny when FINRA fined its US subsidiary $900,000 for deficiencies in regulatory reporting. The violations involved tardy trades and inaccurate reports from November 2015 to March 2023 on the Trade Reporting and Compliance Engine.
Earlier this year, Webull was subject to a $3 million penalty by FINRA. The focus was on the firm's oversight in onboarding options traders and the absence of adequate supervisory systems to identify and address customer complaints. This oversight led to the approval of roughly 9,000 unqualified traders, including more than 2,500 customers under 21 without the required options trading experience.

Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.
Read more

Seaprimecapitals Withdrawal Problems: A Complete Guide to Risks and User Experiences
Worries about Seaprimecapitals withdrawal problems and possible Seaprimecapitals withdrawal delay are important for any trader. Being able to get your money quickly and reliably is the foundation of trust between a trader and their broker. When questions come up about this basic process, it's important to look into what's causing them. This guide will tackle these concerns head-on, giving you a clear, fact-based look at Seaprimecapitals' withdrawal processes, user experiences, and trading conditions. Most importantly, we'll connect these real-world issues to the single most important factor behind them: whether the broker is properly regulated. Understanding this connection is key to figuring out the real risk to your capital and making a smart decision.

iFX Brokers Review: Do Traders Face Withdrawal Issues, Deposit Credit Failures & Free Coupon Mess?
Have you had to pay several fees at iFX Brokers? Had your trading profit been transferred to a scamming website, causing you losses? Failed to receive withdrawals from your iFX Brokers trading account? Has your deposit failed to reflect in your trading account? Got deceived in the name of a free coupon? Did the broker officials not help you in resolving your queries? Your problems resonate with many of your fellow traders at iFX Brokers. In this iFX Brokers review article, we have explained these problems and attached traders’ screenshots. Read on!

NinjaTrader Exposed: Why Traders are Calling Out NinjaTrader’s Lifetime Plan & Chart Data
Did NinjaTrader onboard you in the name of the Lifetime Plan, but its ordinary customer service left you in a poor trading state? Do you witness price chart-related discrepancies on the NinjaTrader app? Did you have to go through numerous identity and address proof checks for account approval? These problems occupy much of the NinjaTrader review online. In this article, we have discussed these through complaint screenshots. Take a look!

World Forex Review: Does the Broker Deny Withdrawals and Scam Traders via Fake Bonuses?
Does World Forex prove to be a not-so-happy trading experience for you? Do you struggle to withdraw your funds from the Saint Vincent and the Grenadines-based forex broker? Do you witness hassles depositing funds? Failing to leverage the World Forex no deposit bonus, as it turned out to be false? These accusations are grabbing everyone’s attention when reading the World Forex review online. In this article, we have shared some of these. Read on!
