UbitMarkets Review 2026: No Regulation, Direct Links to UBIT Coin Scam, and Serious Platform Risks
UbitMarkets review reveals no valid license and direct links to a fraudulent project, raising serious concerns over investor fund safety.
简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
Abstract:HKMA Warns Against Crypto Firms Posing as Banks – Protecting Public from Misleading Descriptions. Learn why false claims violate banking regulations. Stay informed!

The Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) has expressed alarm over crypto businesses misrepresenting themselves as banks, highlighting that such acts contravene the region's Banking Ordinance. The HKMA is taking this action in order to safeguard the public from any misconceptions and hazards linked with these false descriptions.
The HKMA has issued a severe warning to cryptocurrency businesses, asking them to avoid misleading practices such as presenting themselves as banks or advertising their offerings as “deposits.” According to the HKMA, these operations violate Hong Kong's Banking Ordinance, which is meant to regulate financial institutions and protect clients.
The HKMA highlighted its knowledge of crypto firms in a statement made on September 15, using words like “crypto asset banks” and “digital banks” to characterize their activities. Furthermore, the regulator warned crypto businesses from claiming to offer banking services or banking accounts, since such acts may persuade the public to assume they are dealing with reputable financial organizations.

It should be noted that the HKMA does not supervise or regulate cryptocurrency enterprises. As a consequence, the authority lacks the resources to safeguard the security of monies handled by these businesses. The HKMA emphasized that any monies put with cryptocurrency businesses are not protected by the Hong Kong Deposit Protection Scheme, which generally protects deposits kept in conventional banks.
The HKMA advised people to consult the registry of approved institutions on its official website to check the validity of deposit-taking organizations. This record provides information on financial firms that have earned HKMA licenses to conduct banking or deposit-taking activities in Hong Kong.
In summary, the Hong Kong Monetary Authority is taking steps to prohibit cryptocurrency enterprises from misrepresenting themselves as banks and using deceptive descriptions that may mislead the public. The main purpose is to safeguard customers by making sure they understand the nature of the financial services they are using and the amount of regulatory monitoring in place. Individuals must take vigilance and confirm the legitimacy of deposit-taking organizations, particularly when dealing with cryptocurrency-related services in Hong Kong.

Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.

UbitMarkets review reveals no valid license and direct links to a fraudulent project, raising serious concerns over investor fund safety.

Is withdrawing capital from PaxForex too difficult for traders? Has the China-based forex broker made you trade gold, silver and cryptocurrencies despite not having an office in the United States? Do you find its operational style suspicious? You are not alone! Several traders have expressed these concerns when trading with the broker. In this PaxForex review article, we have exposed the broker through user comments made on several review platforms. Take a look!

UK FCA urges firms to tighten complex ETP sales, citing rising retail demand and risks tied to leverage and social media promotions.

FIBO Group has grabbed attention from traders for mostly the wrong reasons, as traders have accused the broker of causing financial losses using malicious tactics. Whether it is about withdrawal access, deposit disappearance, trade manipulation, or awful customer support service, the broker is receiving flak from traders on all aspects online. Our team accumulated a list of complaints against the FIBO Group broker. Let’s screen these with us in this FIBO Group review article.