简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
FCA fines Bastion Capital London Limited £2.5m for serious financial control failings
Abstract:Bastion Capital London Limited (in liquidation) has been fined £2,452,700 by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) due to serious financial crime control failures related to cum-ex trading. The company neglected to effectively manage the risk of being involved in fraudulent trading and money laundering activities.

Bastion Capital London Limited (in liquidation) has been fined £2,452,700 by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) due to serious financial crime control failures related to cum-ex trading. The company neglected to effectively manage the risk of being involved in fraudulent trading and money laundering activities.
During the period between January 2014 and September 2015, Bastion executed trades amounting to approximately £49 billion in Danish equities and £22.5 billion in Belgian equities on behalf of clients from the Solo Group. These trades were conducted in a manner that strongly indicated involvement in financial crime. It appears that the purpose of these trades was to facilitate withholding tax reclaims in Denmark and Belgium. Bastion received a commission of £1.55 million, a significant portion of the firm's revenue during that period.
Moreover, Bastion carried out a series of trades on behalf of 11 Solo Clients within a four-day period. These clients then executed opposite positions shortly after, but at significantly different prices. As a result, one Solo client, Ganymede Cayman Ltd (an entity fully owned by the Solo Group's controller), incurred a loss of €22.7 million, while the remaining 10 Solo Clients benefited from this arrangement.
Bastion either ignored or failed to notice several warning signs associated with these trades, which lacked any apparent economic purpose except for transferring funds from the Solo Group's controller to business associates. Bastion should have assessed the financial crime risks when onboarding these Solo Clients and when executing the trades.
Steve Smart, Joint Executive Director of Enforcement and Market Oversight, stated, “Bastion earned substantial fees by executing trades on behalf of the Solo Group that ultimately aimed to make illegitimate tax reclaims from the Danish and Belgian authorities. They failed to identify clear indicators that should have alerted them to the risk of involvement in financial crime. It is crucial for firms to effectively manage these risks.”
This case marks the fifth instance where the FCA has taken action regarding cum-ex trading and forms part of the FCA's broader efforts to address cum-ex dividend arbitrage cases and withholding tax (WHT) schemes. The FCA has actively collaborated with global law enforcement authorities in this regard. The fines imposed by the FCA on firms involved in this trading have surpassed £20 million, considering that these firms earned over £7 million in fees.
As Bastion did not dispute the FCA's findings and agreed to settle, it qualified for a 30% discount under the FCA's Settlement Discount Scheme.

Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.
Read more

Trading Oscillators: The Secret Tool Every Trader Should Know
If you’ve ever looked at a trading chart and wondered how traders know when a price is “too high” or “too low,” the answer often lies in trading oscillators. A trading oscillator is a type of technical indicator that helps traders measure the momentum of price movements. In simple terms, it tells you when a currency pair, stock, or commodity might be overbought or oversold — which can signal a potential reversal.

Is Amillex Safe or a Scam? Understanding Rules and Security
You are asking an important question: Is Amillex safe or a scam? The simple answer is that Amillex works in an unclear area that needs careful study. It is not a complete scam like fake websites that steal your money right away, but it also does not meet the safety rules of the best, well-regulated brokers. Read on to explore more details.

Voices of the Golden Insight Award Jury | David Bily, Founder and CEO of Moneta Markets
WikiFX Golden Insight Award uniting industry forces to build a safe and healthy forex ecosystem, driving industry innovation and sustainable development, launches a new feature series — “Voices of the Golden Insight Awards Jury.” Through in-depth conversations with distinguished judges, this series explores the evolving landscape of the forex industry and the shared mission to promote innovation, ethics, and sustainability.

ASIC Launches Preliminary Investigation into Clime Australian Income Fund
The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) has launched a preliminary investigation into the Clime Australian Income Fund, examining whether the Fund’s Target Market Determination (TMD) and Product Disclosure Statement (PDS) comply with Australian financial regulations. The investigation will also assess whether any breaches of the law have occurred in relation to the Fund’s investment activities.

