简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
SEC says Binance clients in the U.S. have $2.2 billion “at significant risk."
Abstract:The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has raised concerns over the safety of $2.2 billion in customer assets held by Binance's U.S. subsidiary.

Recently, the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has filed multiple charges against cryptocurrency exchange Binance, its affiliated entities, and CEO Changpeng Zhao, alleging illegal operations and the violation of securities laws. Click this link below for more details.
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has raised concerns over the safety of $2.2 billion in customer assets held by Binance's U.S. subsidiary. The regulatory body has filed an emergency motion, claiming that the cryptocurrency exchange and its founder, Changpeng Zhao, maintain effective control over these funds.
Safety Concerns Surrounding Binance U.S. Customer Assets
The SEC's alarm stems from what they perceive as an insufficient level of assurance regarding the safety of the $2.2 billion in customer assets held by Binance U.S. Despite operating as a separate entity from its parent company, Binance's U.S. subsidiary has come under scrutiny due to perceived control exerted by the primary business and its founder.
SEC's Emergency Motion
To address their concerns, the SEC has taken legal action by filing an emergency motion with a federal court. The motion argues that Binance's main business, in conjunction with Changpeng Zhao, maintains effective control over the billions of dollars of customer funds held by Binance U.S. The regulatory body's aim is to obtain a temporary restraining order to freeze these assets until the situation is clarified and the safety of the funds can be ensured.
Protection of Binance U.S. Clients
The SEC's intervention is driven by the objective of protecting the assets and interests of Binance U.S. clients. By seeking a temporary restraining order, the regulatory body aims to mitigate any potential risks associated with the $2.2 billion in customer assets. This measure would enable the SEC to gain control over the situation and ensure that clients' funds are safeguarded.
Binance's Response
As of now, Binance has not issued an official statement in response to the SEC's emergency motion. However, it is worth noting that the cryptocurrency exchange has faced regulatory scrutiny in the past. Binance has made efforts to comply with regulations by establishing a separate U.S. subsidiary to cater specifically to American customers. Nonetheless, the SEC's concerns about the control exerted by Binance's main business raise questions about the efficacy of these measures.
Conclusion
The SEC's recent emergency motion highlights significant concerns surrounding the safety of $2.2 billion in customer assets held by Binance's U.S. subsidiary. While the regulatory body acknowledges the separate legal entity status of Binance U.S., it argues that the primary business and Changpeng Zhao still wield effective control over these funds. With the objective of protecting Binance U.S. clients, the SEC is seeking a temporary restraining order to freeze these assets until the situation is clarified. This move underscores the ongoing need for regulatory oversight in the cryptocurrency industry and the importance of ensuring the security of customer assets.

Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.
Read more

Grand Capital Doesn’t Feel GRAND for Traders with Withdrawal Denials & Long Processing Times
The trading environment does not seem that rosy for traders at Grand Capital, a Seychelles-based forex broker. Traders’ requests for withdrawals are alleged to be in the review process for months, making them frustrated and helpless. Despite meeting the guidelines, traders find it hard to withdraw funds, as suggested by their complaints online. What’s also troubling traders are long processing times concerning Grand Capital withdrawals. In this Grand Capital review segment, we have shared some complaints for you to look at. Read on!

ADSS Review: Traders Say NO to Trading B’coz of Withdrawal Blocks, Account Freeze & Trade Issues
Does ADSS give you plenty of excuses to deny you access to withdrawals? Is your withdrawal request pending for months or years? Do you witness account freezes from the United Arab Emirates-based forex broker? Do you struggle to open and close your forex positions on the ADSS app? Does the customer support service fail to respond to your trading queries? All these issues have become a rage online. In this ADSS Broker review article, we have highlighted actual trader wordings on these issues. Keep reading!

INGOT Brokers Regulation 2025: ASIC vs Offshore License - What Traders Must Know
Explore INGOT Brokers regulation in 2025: Compare their ASIC and Seychelles FSA licenses, understand trader protection levels, and learn about potential risks in this detailed guide.

INGOT Brokers Review 2025: High Risk or Hidden Gem? Expert Analysis Reveals All
Comprehensive INGOT Brokers review exploring the broker's mixed reputation in 2025. Discover the truth about regulation, trading options, and user experiences before opening an account.
