简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
Abstract:The trading practices of V5 Forex Global come under scrutiny as a trader raises concerns about unilateral trade closures and questionable leverage practices, highlighting the need for transparency and accountability from this broker.
In the realm of online trading, unforeseen circumstances can leave traders perplexed, leading them to question the dependability of their chosen brokers. Recently, a trader raised concerns about the trading practices of V5 Forex Global (V5), highlighting a perplexing incident involving the sudden closure of two trades without the trader's consent. This article aims to delve into the details of the trader's complaint, shedding light on the questionable practices employed by V5.
The trader, eagerly responding to trading signals received from V5, engaged in an EUR/USD trade, which resulted in a meager profit of $4.41 from an initial investment of $7,000. The risk-reward ratio seemed illogical and unconvincing. Subsequently, the trader proceeded with an AUD/JPY trade, resulting in a net loss of $0.60 from an invested amount of $11,800.
What raises the greatest concern in this case is the fact that the trader initially deposited a modest sum of approximately $67. Surprisingly, this entire amount was completely wiped out, leaving the trader with a negative balance of -$722, which was more than ten times their initial investment. The trader is left bewildered, questioning how V5 executed trades with amounts exceeding their original capital.
This incident sheds light on the dubious practices employed by V5, particularly in relation to excessively high leverage used on user accounts, all without their knowledge or consent. As a result, numerous victims of V5 found themselves blindsided as their accounts were completely depleted, contributing to the growing number of complaints regarding account busting and exorbitant commissions previously reported to WikiFX through our Exposure page by other users.
The trader's complaint serves as a call for transparency and accountability within the trading industry. Traders must have a clear understanding of the leverage and associated risks involved in their trades, while brokers must adhere to ethical standards. V5 Forex Global is urged to promptly address the concerns raised by the trader, providing a detailed explanation for the automatic closures and losses incurred. Additionally, the broker should be held accountable for their actions and appropriately compensate the affected traders.
Furthermore, if you have any unresolved disputes with a forex broker, please do not hesitate to contact us at WikiFX through the provided channels for further assistance.
Alternatively, you can submit an Exposure through the WikiFX mobile application, which is available for free download on both Google Play and the App Store. Follow the instructions below to file your complaint:
Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.
In a distressing case of financial deception, a retired female teacher in Malaysia lost RM570,000 of her personal savings and pension to a gold trading investment scheme.
Social media platforms have become breeding grounds for scammers posing as investment gurus, exploiting the growing interest in forex and cryptocurrency trading among Malaysians. Fraudulent "financial experts" often create the illusion of legitimacy by offering enticing stock analyses and promises of high returns.
The Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission (CySEC) has officially withdrawn the Cyprus Investment Firm (CIF) licence of Arumpro Capital Ltd. The decision was finalised during a CySEC meeting on 11 November 2024, marking another chapter in the firm's ongoing regulatory challenges.
Former Copper Strike director convicted for undisclosed shares. Sentenced to 6 months in jail, fined $2,000, and banned from managing companies for 5 years.