FCA-Regulated Forex Brokers Are Declining — 31 Platforms to Avoid
As of December 1, 2025, a total of 105 companies in the United Kingdom held CFD licences.
简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
Abstract:The assets of Silicon Valley Bank (SVB), which failed on Friday after the financial catastrophe more than ten years ago, were confiscated by US authorities.

The assets of Silicon Valley Bank (SVB), which failed on Friday after the financial catastrophe more than ten years ago, were confiscated by US authorities. SVB, the 16th-largest bank in the nation, catered to customers like IT professionals and businesses with venture capital funding. Because of their worry about the bank's position, many of its clients took money this week, which left the bank unable to handle the sizable withdrawals. The bank eventually collapsed despite efforts to collect additional money. As part of its duty to protect assets, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) assumed control of the bank and its administration. Although it may not be well-known to the general public, SVB was one of the biggest banks in the US as of the end of 2022, with $209 billion in assets and roughly $175.4 billion in savings. SVB excelled in funding start-ups.
The loss of Silicon Valley Bank ranks as the second-largest failure of a US retail bank after that of Washington Mutual in 2008. US Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen met with financial officials on Friday to discuss the situation. She reassured them that she believed them to take the necessary action and emphasized the fortitude of the banking industry. Customers who were worried about accessing their money congregated in front of the Santa Clara offices in California. They were instructed to begin withdrawing up to $250,000 (€235,000) on Monday by an FDIC notification. High-deposit venture investors voiced worry about the state of affairs, including a start-up CEO who was worried about his workers' paychecks. The bank's collapse came after it was revealed that it had lost money totaling $1.8 billion (€1.7 billion) despite selling $21 billion (€19.7 billion) in financial assets and failing to generate capital fast enough to manage client transactions. Investors were taken aback by the development, which rekindled concerns about the security of the entire banking sector. This was especially true given the recent sharp increase in interest rates, which is devaluing bonds and driving up credit costs. On Thursday, the four biggest US banks dropped $52 billion (€49 billion) on the stock market, which had negative effects on Asian and European institutions.
Following the financial disaster that struck Silicon Valley Bank (SVB), the second-largest private bank failure in the US since the collapse of Washington Mutual in 2008, European and US institutions are now confronting sizable losses. The fear started when SVB declared it needed to rapidly raise capital to handle huge client withdrawals, but failed to do so, leading to the selling of $21 billion worth of financial assets and a $1.8 billion loss. Because of the sharp increase in interest rates, which decreased the value of the assets in their inventories and raised the cost of loans, the news reignited concerns about the stability of the financial industry. Big Wall Street banks bounced back on Friday, but smaller institutions and those that catered to a particular clientele experienced more turbulence. Experts predict that large banks face a low risk of a capital or liquidity event; however, the failure of SVB has put the bank under unusual financing pressure.
Install the WikiFX App on your smartphone to stay updated on the latest news.
Download link: https://www.wikifx.com/en/download.html?source=fma3

Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.

As of December 1, 2025, a total of 105 companies in the United Kingdom held CFD licences.

With the rapid growth of the global multi-asset investment market, the disparities in the forex industry across different regions have become increasingly evident. As a forex broker information service platform operating in over 200 countries and regions, WikiFX is committed to helping investors in each region identify reliable brokers. Therefore, WikiFX launched a series content — Close Up with WikiFX, which offers in-depth interviews with local brokers. Leveraging WikiFXs robust big data system and industry insights, the series aims to help investors gain a deeper understanding of high-quality brokers. In this exclusive interview, we had the opportunity to speak with Konstantinos Theodorou, CEO of InterStellar Group-Cyprus, to explore the company’s operations and market insights.

BotBro is a Dubai-based forex broker that has continued to grab headlines for years, with its name being involved in one scam after another. In the latest episode, its name was found in the alleged INR 800 crore forex and crypto trading scam in Goa. Top-level agencies, including the Enforcement Directorate (ED), are investigating the case. They have labeled the platform as a Ponzi scheme. The platform is disguised as an AI-powered forex trading app. In connection with this case, the Goa Police Economic Offences Cell (EOC) filed a First Information Report (FIR) against 10 individuals, including the company owner, Lavish Chaudhary Alias Nawab Ali, for fund misappropriation worth over INR 7.3 crore. Read on as we share the BotBro review in this article.

In what would lift the mood of rupee derivative traders, the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) partially lifted some restrictions on rupee derivative trades imposed by the regulator on April 1, 2026. On this day, the central bank prevented banks from issuing non-deliverable forwards to clients and barred companies from reassessing forward contracts as part of its strategy to counter arbitrage trades, which caused fluctuations in the rupee’s exchange rate. The central bank further prevented banks from signing FX derivative contracts involving the rupee with their associated parties. Read on!