简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
Voyager Receives Preliminary Approval For Binance Transaction Amid National Security Concerns
Abstract:Voyager Digital, the bankrupt crypto lender, won preliminary court clearance on Tuesday for a planned $1 billion transfer of its assets to Binance.US and said it would seek to accelerate a U.S. national security examination of the transaction.

January 10 (Reuters) - Voyager Digital, the bankrupt crypto lender, won preliminary court clearance on Tuesday for a planned $1 billion transfer of its assets to Binance.US and said it would seek to accelerate a U.S. national security examination of the transaction.
Voyager was granted permission by U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Michael Wiles in New York to engage in an asset purchase agreement with Binance.US and to request creditor votes on the transaction, which will not become permanent until a future court hearing.
During Tuesday's court hearing, Voyager attorney Joshua Sussberg stated that the company was responding to concerns raised over the holidays by the U.S. Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS), an interagency body that vets foreign investments into U.S. companies for national security risks. He said that Voyager aims to resolve any problems that would cause CFIUS to reject the deal.
“We're working with Binance and its counsel to not just deal with that investigation, but also to voluntarily submit an application to take this process along,” Sussberg said.
CFIUS said in a court filing on December 30 that its review “may impair the parties' capacity to consummate the transactions, the timetable of completion, or pertinent terms.”
Binance's deal comprises a cash payment of $20 million and an agreement to transfer Voyager's clients to Binance.
Sussberg said that the cryptocurrency trade in the United States. Customers would be allowed to withdraw money for the first time since July.
Customers are expected to recover 51% of the value of their deposits at the time of Voyager's bankruptcy filing, according to Voyager.
If the transaction is blocked by CFIUS, Voyager will be obliged to compensate consumers with the crypto it has on hand, resulting in a smaller payment for Voyager users, according to Sussberg.
CFIUS has been increasingly utilized by Washington to block Chinese investment in the United States.
Changpeng Zhao, a Chinese-born Canadian citizen, owns Binance, which has no fixed headquarters. US authorities are investigating the corporation for money laundering. Binance.US, headquartered in Palo Alto, California, claims to be “completely autonomous” of the main Binance platform.
In addition to CFIUS, the US Securities Exchange Commission and state securities authorities rejected Voyager's planned sale. Glenn authorized Voyager to continue despite the objections, noting that securities authorities would be able to protest the sale's ultimate clearance in the future.
Voyager declared bankruptcy in July, months after the collapse of major cryptocurrencies TerraUSD and Luna shook the digital asset sector.
Voyager had intended to transfer its assets to FTX Trading, but the agreement fell through when FTX declared bankruptcy in November after a flurry of client withdrawals and fraud claims, leading to the arrest of founder Sam Bankman-Fried.
WikiFX App download link
https://www.wikifx.com/en/download.html

Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.
Read more

The 5%ers Review: Is it a Scam or Legit? Find Out from These Trader Comments
Did you face reduced leverage and hiked fees without any explanation from The 5%ers broker? Do you find The 5%er rules strange for getting a funded account from this prop trading firm? Has the broker closed your trade inappropriately, preventing you from making gains in the forex market? All these allegations have dominated The 5%ers review segment online. Looking at this, the WikiFX team investigated and found some startling comments against the broker. In this article, we have shared those complaints. Read on!

BROKSTOCK Exposed: Traders Report Login Errors, Withdrawal Issues & Incompetent Customer Support
Is your BROKSTOCK trading account full of inefficiencies? Do the recurrent BROKSTOCK login errors prevent you from opening and shorting positions at a favorable price? Has the broker failed to honor your withdrawal requests? Do you face order execution price issues? Has the customer support service failed to resolve your queries? You are not alone! In this BROKSTOCK review article, we have shared some complaints that need a close introspection. Read on to explore them.

OmegaPro Review: Traders Flood Comment Sections with Withdrawal Denials & Scam Complaints
Has your deposit and withdrawal scenario worsened after the initial good experience at OmegaPro, a UK-based forex broker? Does the broker ask you to invest when withdrawing your funds? Did the broker officials trap you with their false promises of compound interest on your deposit? Have you found it impossible to transfer funds from your OmegaPro login to another broker’s account? Do you witness a lack of support when dealing with these unfortunate trading circumstances? These are no longer isolated complaints — they have allegedly become the reason for OmegaPro’s tarnished trust and reputation within the trading community. Read on as we share the OmegaPro review in this article.

Inzo Broker Review 2025: A Complete Look at Features, Costs and User Claims
Inzo Broker presents itself as a modern forex and CFD broker, started in 2021 and registered in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines. At first glance, it offers an attractive package for traders: access to the popular MetaTrader 5 (MT5) and cTrader platforms, different types of accounts for various budget levels, and a wide selection of assets to trade. These features are made to attract both new and experienced traders. However, a closer look shows a big difference between these advertised benefits and the real risks. The broker works under an offshore regulatory system, which gives limited protection to investors. More importantly, Inzo has collected many serious user complaints, especially about withdrawing funds and changing trading conditions unfairly. This mix of weak oversight and serious user claims creates a high-risk situation that potential clients must carefully think about. This review will break down these parts to give a clear, fact-based view.
