简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
Exclusive-Google hit with antitrust complaint by Danish job search rival
Abstract:Google was hit with an antitrust complaint on Monday after a Danish online job-search rival took its grievance to EU regulators, alleging the Alphabet unit had unfairly favoured its own job search service.

The complaint could reinvigorate EU antitrust chief Margrethe Vestagers scrutiny of the service, Google for Jobs. Vestager said three years ago she was looking into the issue, but has yet to take any action.
The European Commission said it would assess the complaint according to the standard procedures. Jobindex‘s action comes four years after German media group Axel Springer’s jobs portal Stepstone filed a similar complaint against Google.
Google, which has been fined more than 8 billion euros ($8.4 billion) by Vestager in recent years for various anti-competitive practices, says it partners with job providers to direct people to websites with job listings relevant to them.
“Any jobs provider, big or small, is able to take part and companies are seeing increased traffic and job matches as a result of this feature,” a Google spokesperson said.
Launched in Europe in 2018, Google for Jobs triggered criticism from 23 online job-search websites in 2019. They said they had lost market share after the online search giant had allegedly used its market power to push its new service.
Googles service links to postings aggregated from many employers, allowing candidates to filter, save and get alerts about openings, though they must go elsewhere to apply. Google places a large widget for the tool at the top of results for ordinary web searches.
Jobindex, one of the 23 critics three years ago, said Google had skewed what had been a highly competitive Danish market towards itself via anticompetitive means.
Founder and CEO Kaare Danielsen said Jobindex had built up the largest jobs database in Denmark by the time Google for Jobs entered the local market last year.
“Nevertheless, in the short time following the introduction of Google for Jobs in Denmark, Jobindex lost 20% of search traffic to Googles inferior service,” Danielsen told Reuters.
“By putting its own inferior service at the top of results pages, Google in effect hides some of the most relevant job offerings from job seekers. Recruiters in turn may no longer reach all job seekers, unless they use Googles job service,” he said.
“This does not just stifle competition amongst recruitment services but directly impairs labour markets, which are central to any economy,” Danielsen said, urging the Commission to order Google to stop the alleged anti-competitive practices, fine the company and impose periodic payments to ensure compliance.
Jobindex said it had seen examples of free-riding, with some of its own job ads copied without its permission and marketed through Google for Jobs on behalf of Jobindexs business partners. It also cited privacy risks to job applicants and its clients.

Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.
Read more

Seacrest Markets Exposed: Are You Facing Payout Denials and Spread Issues with This Prop Firm?
Seacrest Markets has garnered wrath from traders owing to a variety of reasons, including payout denials for traders winning trading challenges, high slippage causing losses, the lack of response from the customer support official to address withdrawal issues, and more. Irritated by these trading inefficiencies, a lot of traders have given a negative review of Seacrest Markets prop firm. In this article, we have shared some of them. Take a look!

GKFX Review: Are Traders Facing Slippage and Account Freeze Issues?
Witnessing capital losses despite tall investment return assurances by GKFX officials? Do these officials sound too difficult for you to judge, whether they offer real or fake advice? Do you encounter slippage issues causing a profit reduction on the GKFX login? Is account freezing usual at GKFX? Does the United Kingdom-based forex broker prevent you from accessing withdrawals? You are not alone! In this GKFX review guide, we have shared the complaints. Take a look!

Is Seaprimecapitals Regulated? A Complete Look at Its Safety and How It Works
The straightforward answer to this important question is no. Seaprimecapitals works as a broker without proper regulation. This fact is the most important thing any trader needs to know, because it creates serious risks for your capital and how safely the company operates. While this broker offers some good features, like the popular MetaTrader 5 platform and a low starting deposit, these benefits cannot make up for the major risks that come from having no real financial supervision. This article will give you a detailed, fact-based look at Seaprimecapitals regulation, what the company claims to do, the services it provides, and the clear differences between official information and user reviews. Our purpose is to give you the information you need to make a smart decision about the risks and benefits of working with this company.

Major Complaints of MUFG Broker in 2025 You Shouldn’t Ignore
2025 is about to end, and if you still want to be a trader or investor and are looking for a broker to invest with. It is important to read real user complaints first. This will help you understand the kind of problems users are facing with MUFG broker. In this article, we will tell you about the major complaints users have reported about MUFG in 2025, so you know what to watch out for. Do not ignore this MUFG broker article and understand the problems.
