简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
Westpac Faces $83 Million Fine for Several Lapses
Abstract:Westpac, a major Australian bank and financial services provider, has been ordered by a federal court to pay a penalty of AU$113 million (around $82.9 million) for compliance failures across multiple business units.

The bank charged services fees to over 11,800 deceased customers.
The judge said that the bank “systemically” failed to address the lapses.
Take Advantage of the Biggest Financial Event in London.
Announced on Friday, the court decision came on six separate civil proceedings against the bank filed by the Australian financial market supervisor, ASIC, last November.
Systemic Lapses
The major compliance breaches by the bank include charging advice fees to over 11,800 deceased customers for financial advice services and distributing duplicate insurance policies to over 7,000 customers. For the first, it was penalized with AU$40 million, whereas it need to pay $15 million for the other offense.
The bank also charged ongoing contribution fees for financial advice to retail customers without any proper disclosure. In the past eight years, it charged at least AU$10.6 million to more than 25,000 customer accounts without providing any disclosure. For this, the bank has been penalized to pay AU$6 million.
Further, Westpac allowed around 21,000 deregistered company accounts with AU$120 million in fund holdings to remain open. These funds should have been remitted to the ASIC or the Commonwealth, but the bank allowed withdrawals. The court found that the bank was aware of its system flaws but did not fix them and continued to benefit from them. Now, it needs to pay AU$20 million for this lapse.
The court also slapped further AU$12 million and AU$20 million penalties separately for debt on sale and insurance superannuation lapses, respectively.
“The breaches found by the Court in these six cases demonstrate a profound failure by Westpac over many years and across many areas of its business to implement appropriate systems and processes to ensure its customers were treated fairly,” said ASICs Deputy Chair, Sarah Court.
“Consumer harm caused by systems failures is unacceptable. Financial institutions must invest in systems that allow them to meet their obligations to customers.”
Meanwhile, Westpac is not a stranger to such hefty fines for non-compliance measures. In 2020, the bank agreed to pay AU1.3 billion as a fine for several non-compliance allegations brought by the ASIC.

Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.
Read more

Maven Trading Review: Traders Flag Funding Rule Issues, Stop-Loss Glitches & Wide Spreads
Are you facing funding issues with Maven Trading, a UK-based prop trading firm? Do you find Mavin trading rules concerning stop-loss and other aspects strange and loss-making? Does the funding program access come with higher spreads? Does the trading data offered on the Maven Trading login differ from what’s available on the popular TradingView platform? These are some specific issues concerning traders at Maven Trading. Upset by these untoward financial incidents, some traders shared complaints while sharing the Maven Trading Review. We have shared some of their complaints in this article. Take a look.

BTSE Review: Ponzi Scam, KYC Verification Hassles & Account Blocks Hit Traders Hard
Have you lost your capital with BTSE’s Ponzi scam? Did the forex broker onboard you by promising no KYC verification on both deposits and withdrawals, only to be proven wrong in real time? Have you been facing account blocks by the Virgin Islands-based forex broker? These complaints have become usual with traders at BTSE Exchange. In this BTSE review article, we have shared some of these complaints for you to look at. Read on!

Amillex Global Secures ASIC Licence for Expansion
Amillex Global gains ASIC AFSL licence, boosting FX and CFDs credibility. Expansion targets Asia, Australia, and institutional trading growth.

Inzo Broker Review 2025: Is It Legit or a High-Risk Gamble?
When you ask, "Is inzo broker legit?" you want a clear, straight answer before putting your money at risk. The truth about Inzo Broker is complicated. Finding out if it's legitimate means looking carefully at its rules, trading setup, and most importantly, the real experiences of traders who have used it. The broker shows a mixed picture - it has official paperwork from an offshore regulator, but it also has many user warnings about how it operates. This review gives you a fair and fact-based investigation. We will break down all the information we can find, from company records to serious user complaints, so you can make your own clear decision.
