简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
Interactive Brokers Ends Q1 2022 with 28% Revenue Drop
Abstract:The first quarter of the year turned out to be sluggish for the broker. The board approved a $0.10 per share dividend.

Interactive Brokers (Nasdaq: IBKR), an American electronic trading venue, released its financials for the first quarter of 2021, reporting a significant decline in its revenue and income.
According to the official numbers, the broker generated net revenue of $645 million between January and March, which is a year-over-year decline of almost 28 percent. On adjusted bases, this figure came in at $692 million, compared to $796 million a year before.
The broker has further detailed that its commission-based revenue declined by 15 percent to $349 million. The drop in this figure resulted from an “unusually active trading period last year, but was aided by higher customer options and futures trading volumes.”
Decline in Income
The company reported a pre-tax income of $394 million for the quarter, with the adjusted figure at $441 million. These numbers dropped from $639 million and $542 million, respectively, from the figure of the same quarter a year before.
The net interest income of the broker also decreased by 8 percent to $282 million, primarily due to a drop in securities lending activity but was offset by gains on margin lending and segregated cash balances. But the other income dropped by $159 million to a loss of $39 million.
Overall, Interactive Brokers ended the quarter with diluted earnings of $0.74 per share, compared to last years $1.16. The adjusted figure came in at $0.82 per share, which was down from $0.98 in Q1 2021. It will also pay a quarterly cash dividend of $0.10 per share.
The pre-tax profit margin of the broker declined to 61 percent from the previous years 72 percent. The adjusted profit margins for Q1 2022 and 2021 were 64 percent and 68 percent, respectively.
On the customer metrics front, the number of accounts with the broker jumped by 36 percent to 1.81 million. Customer equity also grew by 8 percent to $355.9 billion. However, there was a decline in DARTs by 24 percent to 2.52 million.

Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.
Read more

Garanti BBVA Securities Exposed: Traders Report Unfair Charges & Poor Customer Service
Have you been financially ruined through chargebacks allowed by Garanti BBVA Securities? Do you have to wait for hours to get your queries resolved by the broker’s customer support official? Did the same scenario prevail when you contact the officials in-person? Failed to close your account as Garanti BBVA Securities officials remained unresponsive to your calls? Many have expressed similar concerns while sharing the Garanti BBVA Securities review online. In this article, we have shared some complaints against the broker. Take a look!

In-Depth Review of Stonefort Securities Withdrawals and Funding Methods – What Traders Should Really
For any experienced forex and CFD trader, the mechanics of moving capital are as critical as the trading strategy itself. The efficiency, security, and transparency of a broker's funding procedures form the bedrock of a trustworthy, long-term trading relationship. A broker can offer the tightest spreads and the most advanced platform, but if depositing funds is cumbersome or withdrawing profits is a battle, all other advantages become moot. This review provides a data-driven examination of Stonefort Securities withdrawals and funding methods. We will dissect the available information on payment options, processing times, associated costs, and the real-world user experience. Our analysis is anchored primarily in data from the global broker regulatory inquiry platform, WikiFX, supplemented by a critical look at publicly available information to provide a comprehensive and unbiased perspective for traders evaluating this broker.

MH Markets Deposits and Withdrawals Overview: A Data-Driven Analysis for Traders
For any experienced trader, the integrity of a broker is not just measured by its spreads or platform stability, but by the efficiency and reliability of its financial plumbing. The ability to deposit and, more importantly, withdraw capital without friction is a cornerstone of trust. This review provides an in-depth, data-driven analysis of the MH Markets deposits and withdrawals overview, examining the entire fund management lifecycle—from funding methods and processing speeds to fees and potential obstacles. MH Markets, operating for 5-10 years under the name Mohicans Markets (Ltd), has established a global footprint. With a WikiFX score of 7.08/10, it positions itself as a multi-asset broker offering a range of account types and access to the popular MetaTrader platforms. However, for a discerning trader, the real test lies in the details of its payment systems and the security of their funds. This article dissects the MH Markets funding methods withdrawal experience, leveraging pr

GAIN Capital Review: Exploring Complaints on Withdrawal Denials, Fake Return Promises & More
Is your forex trading experience with GAIN Capital full of financial scams? Does the broker disallow you from withdrawing your funds, including profits? Have you been scammed under the guise of higher return promises by an official? Does the GAIN Capital forex broker not have an effective customer support service for your trading queries? Concerned by this, many traders have shared negative GAIN Capital reviews online. In this article, we have discussed some of them. Read on!
