简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
Russian Demand for Rouble Payments for Gas Further Complicates EU-Russia Energy Stand-off
Abstract:Russia‘s demand for so-called “unfriendly countries” to pay for natural gas in rouble will likely support the sanctions-hit Russian currency only near term through using the country’s energy leverage over Europe.

Russian President Vladimir Putin has asked the government to instruct state-controlled gas monopolist Gazprom to amend existing contracts such that “unfriendly countries”, including EU member states, start payment in rouble for imports of Russian natural gas. The Bank of Russia (CBR) is to develop a mechanism for processing such payment.
The near-term support for rouble will come at the cost for Russia of further encouraging the European Union to reduce its reliance on Russian energy imports as fast as possible – though that will take time given the infrastructure bottlenecks in the natural gas sector especially.
Financial gain looks moderate for Russia
Russia has already required exporters to sell 80% of forex revenue to support rouble since sanctions froze around half of Russian international reserves. Asking buyers of Russian natural gas to exchange hard currency for rouble increases this rate of rouble conversion to 100% as regards gas exports.
However, the foreign-currency sale requirement on Gazprom could have been increased to 100% anyhow. The move to demand payments in rouble is a strategic retaliation against the EU based upon leverage that Russia exercises as the most important supplier of natural gas to Europe, with Russian supplies amounting to more than 75% of aggregate gas demand of some countries in central and eastern Europe.
The Russian administration is also trying to increase the CBRs capacity to manage the currency by forcing trade in natural gas to take place in domestic currency and pushing major foreign-currency flows to take place via the CBR, a sign of how financial sanctions have damaged the role of the central bank in steerage of the Russian economy.
Rouble payments for gas could increase CBR capacity to function under a prevailing sanctions regime, given current limitations on the CBRs scope to transact with central banks in the European Union.
EU faces further energy-trading complexity, risk of gas-supply disruption
Russias latest demand could result in gas-contract renegotiation and changes in the duration of gas contracts on top of legal challenges should EU countries argue that the conversion would be a breach of contract. Around 58% of Gazprom gas sales to Europe and other countries are settled via euro, with another 39% in dollar. Any legal stalemate increases risk of disruptions in Russian exports to Europe, which could be painful for select countries short term.
In the longer run, Russias new measures are likely to accelerate EU efforts to diversify away from Russian oil and gas. The European Commission has outlined a plan to make Europe independent of Russian fossil fuels before 2030. This plan could lower demand for Russian gas by two thirds before the end of the current year. In the near term, an outcome of the Russian move could be for the EU to specify lower purchase volumes of Russian gas.
For a look at all of todays economic events, check out our economic calendar.
Levon Kameryan is Senior Analyst in Sovereign and Public Sector ratings at Scope Ratings GmbH.

Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.
Read more

The 5%ers Review: Is it a Scam or Legit? Find Out from These Trader Comments
Did you face reduced leverage and hiked fees without any explanation from The 5%ers broker? Do you find The 5%er rules strange for getting a funded account from this prop trading firm? Has the broker closed your trade inappropriately, preventing you from making gains in the forex market? All these allegations have dominated The 5%ers review segment online. Looking at this, the WikiFX team investigated and found some startling comments against the broker. In this article, we have shared those complaints. Read on!

BROKSTOCK Exposed: Traders Report Login Errors, Withdrawal Issues & Incompetent Customer Support
Is your BROKSTOCK trading account full of inefficiencies? Do the recurrent BROKSTOCK login errors prevent you from opening and shorting positions at a favorable price? Has the broker failed to honor your withdrawal requests? Do you face order execution price issues? Has the customer support service failed to resolve your queries? You are not alone! In this BROKSTOCK review article, we have shared some complaints that need a close introspection. Read on to explore them.

OmegaPro Review: Traders Flood Comment Sections with Withdrawal Denials & Scam Complaints
Has your deposit and withdrawal scenario worsened after the initial good experience at OmegaPro, a UK-based forex broker? Does the broker ask you to invest when withdrawing your funds? Did the broker officials trap you with their false promises of compound interest on your deposit? Have you found it impossible to transfer funds from your OmegaPro login to another broker’s account? Do you witness a lack of support when dealing with these unfortunate trading circumstances? These are no longer isolated complaints — they have allegedly become the reason for OmegaPro’s tarnished trust and reputation within the trading community. Read on as we share the OmegaPro review in this article.

Inzo Broker Review 2025: A Complete Look at Features, Costs and User Claims
Inzo Broker presents itself as a modern forex and CFD broker, started in 2021 and registered in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines. At first glance, it offers an attractive package for traders: access to the popular MetaTrader 5 (MT5) and cTrader platforms, different types of accounts for various budget levels, and a wide selection of assets to trade. These features are made to attract both new and experienced traders. However, a closer look shows a big difference between these advertised benefits and the real risks. The broker works under an offshore regulatory system, which gives limited protection to investors. More importantly, Inzo has collected many serious user complaints, especially about withdrawing funds and changing trading conditions unfairly. This mix of weak oversight and serious user claims creates a high-risk situation that potential clients must carefully think about. This review will break down these parts to give a clear, fact-based view.
