简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
EU Parliament Approves Wallet Host Identity Revealing Bill for a Final Vote
Abstract:The bill is expected to move for trilogues with the European Commission and the European Council within the next two weeks.

Key Insights:
The ECON – LIBE voting session ended with the bill receiving majority support.
The bill is not expected to observe friction during the final vote either.
Crypto community observes this as a massive blow to self-hosted wallets.
The sovereignty of crypto lies in its decentralization, anonymity, and independence, but it seems like the EU Parliament does not much care for it.
The voting session that ended today puts the entire existence of self-hosted wallets at threat of extinction as no one would be willing to lose their right to anonymity in the European Union.
Another Threat to Crypto
The ECON – LIBE voting session released the results of the roll-call votes in which the votes were tallied as 58 for, 52 against, with 7 abstentions. This results in the approval of the amendments to the Transfer of Funds Regulation.
According to these amendments, crypto service providers will be required to verify the self-hosted wallets, which are also known as “Unhosted wallets”, owners identities.
However, the threat doesnt stop just at these wallets as the crypto service providers, primarily cryptocurrency exchanges, would also fall into the crosshairs of the regulators.
And the approval of this bill would provide the regulators with the ammunition to constantly monitor them, killing the purpose of crypto.
The reason people choose these self-hosted wallets is to ensure privacy and protection.
Still, the EU Parliament intends on abolishing that as the potential threat of an unwarranted investigation into ones business would keep people away from using them, thus bringing an end to this service in the EU.

Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.
Read more

Grand Capital Doesn’t Feel GRAND for Traders with Withdrawal Denials & Long Processing Times
The trading environment does not seem that rosy for traders at Grand Capital, a Seychelles-based forex broker. Traders’ requests for withdrawals are alleged to be in the review process for months, making them frustrated and helpless. Despite meeting the guidelines, traders find it hard to withdraw funds, as suggested by their complaints online. What’s also troubling traders are long processing times concerning Grand Capital withdrawals. In this Grand Capital review segment, we have shared some complaints for you to look at. Read on!

EmiraX Markets Withdrawal Issues Exposed
EmiraX Markets Review reveals unregulated status, fake license claims, and withdrawal issues. Stay safe and avoid this broker.

ADSS Review: Traders Say NO to Trading B’coz of Withdrawal Blocks, Account Freeze & Trade Issues
Does ADSS give you plenty of excuses to deny you access to withdrawals? Is your withdrawal request pending for months or years? Do you witness account freezes from the United Arab Emirates-based forex broker? Do you struggle to open and close your forex positions on the ADSS app? Does the customer support service fail to respond to your trading queries? All these issues have become a rage online. In this ADSS Broker review article, we have highlighted actual trader wordings on these issues. Keep reading!

INGOT Brokers Regulation 2025: ASIC vs Offshore License - What Traders Must Know
Explore INGOT Brokers regulation in 2025: Compare their ASIC and Seychelles FSA licenses, understand trader protection levels, and learn about potential risks in this detailed guide.
