简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
Solana Cashio Hack Loots $52.8M: Investigations Reveal Surprising Facts
Abstract:Crypto trading platform Bybit said that the hack drained $52.8 million worth of stablecoins including USDC, USDT and UST from Cashio and Saber.

Key Insights:
Solanas Cashio hack drained $52.8 million from the protocol.
To prevent, protocols should be properly and thoroughly audited.
Hacker left a message to return funds for accounts below 100K and donate the rest to charity.
Cashio (CASH), a native stablecoin of Solana, recently lost millions after hackers exploited an “infinite mint glitch.” The attackers drained a staggering $52.8 million from the protocol, following which the CASH stablecoin collapsed from $1 to $0.00005, which left the entire decentralized finance (DeFi) ecosystem appalled.
Initially, it was reported that Cashios protocol exploited cryptos equaling about $28 million. According to a security researcher Samczsun, the project lost around $50 million (based on quick skimming).

With these estimates aside, crypto trading platform Bybit came up with a fresh investigation on the hack, discovering precisely $52.8 million of stolen funds.
“The exploited amount also far exceeded what most other publications reported. To elucidate, most publications who reported on this exploit seem to think that $28 million was drained from this hack,” the Bybit readings noted.
As a quick recap, CASH, the dollar-pegged stablecoin, is minted by depositing stable pair liquidity provider tokens (LP tokens), in this case, USDT and USDC pair in a 50:50 ratio on Solanas decentralized exchange – Saber.
What Actually Happened? A to Z of the Hack
FXEmpire spoke to a team from Bybit comprising Derek Lim, head of crypto insights, Gabriel Foo, senior research analyst and Fathur Rahman, COO of SolanaFM, on the alarming exploit. Per their findings, the hacker first managed to mint “two billion CASH tokens” by using the perpetrators unknown tokens. But, how is this possible?
Furthermore, the hacker burnt part of the newly minted CASH tokens (2 billion) for the Saber USDT-USDC LP tokens. The hacker then swapped the LP pair tokens for $16.4 million USDC and $10.8 million USDT.
The Bybit investigations further found that the remaining CASH tokens were swapped out for $8.6 million UST and $17 million USDC through Saber. Finally, the hacker swapped $15.3 million in USDC and USDT after draining $52.8 million.
The hacker used the Jupiter liquidity aggregator on Solana to transfer the funds in 3 transactions to an Ethereum address through the Wormhole Bridge.
How To Prevent such Hacks? Possible Solutions
This isnt the first time a DeFi protocol has been looted for millions; however, this is the first of its kind “infinite mint” glitch. Every time after an attack, HODLers are warned to keep their tokens safe.
To prevent such acts, the team suggested the protocols to ensure that they have been properly and thoroughly audited. He said that DApps should adopt certain Tradfi structures and those of the big tech companies. Talking to FXEmpire,
“In other words, a more stringent auditing process should be initiated.”
This can be achieved by mandatory tests on the devnet for internal checks, during the development phase of any DApps. Furthermore, once the team is ready to stage the product after all internal checks, audit companies and tech alfa groups must step in to clear any bugs, edge cases, etc.
When the beta version is ready, more experts should be brought in to do a final check before the apps roll-out. Team consisting Foo and Rahman added,

Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.
Read more

Inzo Broker Review 2025: Is It Legit or a High-Risk Gamble?
When you ask, "Is inzo broker legit?" you want a clear, straight answer before putting your money at risk. The truth about Inzo Broker is complicated. Finding out if it's legitimate means looking carefully at its rules, trading setup, and most importantly, the real experiences of traders who have used it. The broker shows a mixed picture - it has official paperwork from an offshore regulator, but it also has many user warnings about how it operates. This review gives you a fair and fact-based investigation. We will break down all the information we can find, from company records to serious user complaints, so you can make your own clear decision.

Uniglobe Markets Review 2025: A Complete Guide to an Unregulated Broker
Uniglobe Markets claims to be an online trading company that offers many different types of investments, including foreign currency and raw materials. The company tries to attract traders by offering high leverage, different account options, and popular MetaTrader trading software. However, there is one major problem: the company does not have proper regulatory oversight. This creates serious concerns about the safety of clients’ capital and whether the company operates honestly. Read on to learn more about its regulatory status.

The 5%ers Review: Is it a Scam or Legit? Find Out from These Trader Comments
Did you face reduced leverage and hiked fees without any explanation from The 5%ers broker? Do you find The 5%er rules strange for getting a funded account from this prop trading firm? Has the broker closed your trade inappropriately, preventing you from making gains in the forex market? All these allegations have dominated The 5%ers review segment online. Looking at this, the WikiFX team investigated and found some startling comments against the broker. In this article, we have shared those complaints. Read on!

Inzo Broker Review 2025: A Complete Look at Features, Costs and User Claims
Inzo Broker presents itself as a modern forex and CFD broker, started in 2021 and registered in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines. At first glance, it offers an attractive package for traders: access to the popular MetaTrader 5 (MT5) and cTrader platforms, different types of accounts for various budget levels, and a wide selection of assets to trade. These features are made to attract both new and experienced traders. However, a closer look shows a big difference between these advertised benefits and the real risks. The broker works under an offshore regulatory system, which gives limited protection to investors. More importantly, Inzo has collected many serious user complaints, especially about withdrawing funds and changing trading conditions unfairly. This mix of weak oversight and serious user claims creates a high-risk situation that potential clients must carefully think about. This review will break down these parts to give a clear, fact-based view.
